[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 176617] Review Request: libupnp

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libupnp


tcallawa redhat com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk redhat com              |tcallawa redhat com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |

------- Additional Comments From tcallawa redhat com  2006-01-19 17:45 EST -------

- rpmlint checks return:

E: libupnp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libupnp.so.1.2.1 libupnp.so
E: libupnp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libthreadutil.so libthreadutil.so
E: libupnp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libixml.so libixml.so
W: libupnp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libupnp.so

The invalid soname issue is a symptom of bad code, but this isn't fatal. Safe to
ignore all rpmlint errors and the warning.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- creates no directories
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]