[Bug 176200] Review Request: Mud Magic Client

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Mud Magic Client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176200


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |wtogami at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2006-01-25 00:09 EST -------
Hmm, it looks like you are basing this package on the old fedora.us guidelines.
 It is apparent that you haven't read the new Fedora Extras guidelines.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/
Please read through the new packaging requirements and process.

A few obvious things that need fixing, there might be more...
- %define version         1.8
This is unnecessary, just put the number directly after Version:
- Release: does not follow the new Extras guidelines
- %{_libdir}/libmudmagic.a
  %{_libdir}/libmudmagic.la
Do not ship these within the package.  Please delete them perhaps during %install.

I suppose it is OK to fix up the spec first in this case, but typically one only
submits a package for review only after they have a version that they intend on
releasing.  Please re-submit another URL when you have read through the
packaging guidelines and made necessary changes.  Maybe wait until after you
have an official 1.8 release too in order to avoid confusion?

After package approval, sponsorship of your membership will be based not on the
package approval but your demonstration of understanding of the guidelines and
process as documented in those web pages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.