[Bug 178709] Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178709





------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr  2006-01-26 02:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
...
> > I think it's not relevant with this package.
> What makes you think so? I disagree on this.
> If these files are host development files (very likely), then they should go to
> a *-devel package, if these files are target development files they are
> miss-places. I'd suggest you to implement a *-devel package.

I don't know what to do about it! at the beginning i have implemented a devel
package but contacting upstream and comparing with ghdl
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172547) leads me to make
only one package as for a compliler. All these files are needed by freehdl to be
compiled with gcc. I'm not a specialist with this so i would like to have more
opinions.

> Besides this, there are further minor issues:
> * freehdl-config --cxxflags returns -I/usr/include
> * freehdl-config --ldflags returns -L/usr/lib

I'm not sure to see where the problem is. the returns seems fine for me. no ?

> * Some of the doc files aren't utf-8 nor asci encoded (German umlauts, probably
> iso8859-1 or iso8859-15 encoded).

You are right. How to solve this ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.