opengroupware for FE

Erwin Rol mailinglists at erwinrol.com
Wed Jul 5 10:53:03 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 12:23 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 2006, at 14:43, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > >That's how it is done now already. gnustep-make, libFoundation are
> > >non-issues. libobjc-lf2 is a hack, but in this light still packaged
> > >decently, but getting rid of it would be a blessing.
> > 
> > We have released libFoundation 1.1.0 which removes the hack
> 
> So gnustep-make can safely use -lobjc instead of -lobjc-lf2 as a
> default?
> 
> > and adds a preliminary x86_64 port (seems to work fine but is not
> > well tested ...):
> > 
> >   http://svn.opengroupware.org/ThirdParty/releases/libFoundation-1.1.0/
> > 
> > We'll work on packaging it (including RPMs and tarballs) ASAP but  
> > maybe you want to look into this as well for your Fedora package.
> 
> I'd prefer using a released tarball otherwise it will make the review
> process much harder (the reviewer is supposed to check the sources).
> 
> Even if it sounds silly, can you please just officially upload the
> tarball to a permanent URL? Thanks!

So after this is done it means gnustep-make and libFoundation packages
can be added to FE ? Axel will you "arrange" that ? 

The next step would be sope, Helge is there any magic going on in sope,
or is that just a matter of packaging the latest release tarball. Like
Axel mentioned working from a non tarball makes things a bit hard (local
testing would work of course).

- Erwin





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list