[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FESCo Election Results



On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:14:35PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> >Also I question the "Vote for no more than 13" limit. Approval voting
> >systems don't usually place a limit.
> +1
> I think a lot of people felt they had to vote for 13 members and voted
> for people they were unsure about just to fill the 13 number.  By not
> having any limit it is clear to voters that they can vote on as many
> or as few people as they like.  Voting for every member would be the
> same as not voting at all.

If we're going to get all fancy, I'd kind of like to see a "Yes/No/No
Opinion" choice. As it is, it's not clear from the lack of a checkmark if I
don't care or if I TOTALLY HATE THEM because they don't put version numbers
in their changelogs. *



*   :)


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]