[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop



On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 02:26 -0400, bugzilla redhat com wrote:
> Please do not reply directly to this 
Now that bugzilla seems to be broken, it seems to have swallowed my
reply ;)

> Summary: Review Request: ntop
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From michael knox net nz  2006-07-07 02:18 EST -------
> (In reply to comment #29)

> > * upstream uses the -release for libtool using the package version,
> > this is wrong in general, since it trigggers a soname change even
> > when the abi don't change, however those libraries are not meant to
> > ne linked against, so if the *.so that don't have the release within
> > their names are not distributed it is right.
> 
> I am not sure I follow you here. Could you clarify? 

c.f. info libtool 'Release numbers'

Upstream is using -release, which is a bad idea.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]