FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )
Andy Burns
fedora at adslpipe.co.uk
Sat Jul 8 18:23:58 UTC 2006
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Agreed -- that's a common problem AFAICS (some bugs were for example
> accidentally assigned to the default and mostly ignored
> bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info account).
Oh, having just looked at the activity and re-assigned the owner to it's
original, but you're saying that "sink" was never the correct owner anyway?
I just did a bugzilla query on
product=Fedora Extras
version=devel
component=Package Review
bug_status=NEW
and the vast majority seem to be assigned to "sink"
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list