FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )

Andy Burns fedora at adslpipe.co.uk
Sat Jul 8 18:23:58 UTC 2006


Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Agreed -- that's a common problem AFAICS (some bugs were for example
> accidentally assigned to the default and mostly ignored
> bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info account).

Oh, having just looked at the activity and re-assigned the owner to it's 
original, but you're saying that "sink" was never the correct owner anyway?

I just did a bugzilla query on
	product=Fedora Extras
	version=devel
	component=Package Review
	bug_status=NEW

and the vast majority seem to be assigned to "sink"





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list