[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Question about WTFPL



On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 08:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> seth vidal wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 00:43 +0200, Michał Bentkowski wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> User Ian Chapman on
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 placed a
> >> review request to package with WTFPL license. And my question is
> >> simple: is it permissible in Extras?
> >> More information about it is here: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
> > 
> > 
> > I've forwarded this to the fedora legal contact.
> > 
> 
> Why? Licenses don't get much free-er then this, I thought we only needed
> to contact legal if we had questions about a license?

Because the legal department needs a good chuckle every now and
again. ;-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]