rpms/sextractor/FC-4 sextractor.spec,1.2,1.3

[Jesse Keating]

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 15:55, Chris Weyl wrote:
> Erm, not to pour gasoline on a fire, but this brings up some very
> interesting questions.  What is the scope/purview of the packaging
> committee, and is it defined anywhere?  Regardless of the merits of
> this issue, does something like this -- how to actually _build_
> software for extras -- more properly fall under, say, FESCo's
> jurisdiction?

The packaging committee covers guidelines for both Core and Extras (and RHEL5 
too if you want to know), so there are more than just FESCO that have vested 
interest.  In reality, the Fedora Board has jurisdiction and has appointed 
the packaging committee to oversee it.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060725/aafc9d57/attachment.sig>