hard time finding packages really for review

[Jarod Wilson]

On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 00:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have seen floating around the idea that there was a need for reviewers 
> for old reviews. So I started with the packages in FE-NEW with no activity
> in eight weeks:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus?highlight=%28package%29#head-6ebf09953da14bdd17d75280dba5b4cffb941077-3
> but I had a hard time to find a package really waiting for a review. In
> the end I ended up looking at all of them, and here are the statistics
> (I removed kmobiletools, accepted closed):
> 
> 7  packages are stuck in review for various reasons
> 11 packages are stuck because they are waiting for submitters
> 10 packages were stuck with a need of a reviewer
[...]
> Here are the details if you don't trust my numbers :)
> 
> Review stuck 6:
> disagreament:
> fnord freedt
> 
> licence issue:
> acx-kmod acx-kmod-common
> 
> wondering about whether it is a good idea to include in extras or not:
> alsa-oss phpBB
> 
> needsponsor 1:
> gq
> 
> waiting for submitter 11:
> smixer smokeping sparse gitweb mondo lurker libpri magic socat
> fxload kdiff3
> 
> Waiting for review 10:
> xmms-musepack transconnect ardour pyscript Wcl linux-wlan-ng gpc
> vdr-osdteletext vdr-subtitles sqlgrey

Oddly enough, the three packages I've recently submitted for review,
which are all still sitting in state FE-NEW, are not listed in any of
the above groups...

zabbix - 198562
ip6sic - 198586
dircproxy - 197740

If anyone wants something to review, I'd certainly welcome feedback on
the above. :)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060726/a3054b28/attachment.sig>