FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006

Michael J. Knox michael at knox.net.nz
Mon Jun 12 07:34:15 UTC 2006


Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> michael at knox.net.nz said:
>> Should be ignored by the QA script:
>> lineak_xosdplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin Are in the
>> owners.list, however the name differs from the subject of the review
>> request. Sub the "_" for a "-".
> 
> At first, I had a list of BZ tickets for which the script could not determine 
> the correct package name (file bzId_pkg.txt attached to the
> Extras/UsefulScripts wiki page).  But I think it was a bad idea: very hard to 
> maintain.  I think the proper way to handle those is to fix the Summary line 
> of the affected BZ tickets.  Which I have done with the lineak* tickets.

Ok, I will fix up those bz reports then.

>> Re-Review is actually jed, which is in the owners.list
>
> Yup.  Fixed the script so that it groks this one too.

Just saw that ;)

>> kimdaba has been replaced by kphotoalbum, which is in the owners.list
> 
> But there still is a kimdaba package with a full devel branch...  So
> something is wrong somewhere...

Rex is looking into it I believe.

>> libgsf113 appears to have been removed from cvs, repos and owners.list 
> 
> This one has been blacklisted now.
> 

Nice!

Thanks

Michael




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list