FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
Michael J. Knox
michael at knox.net.nz
Mon Jun 12 07:34:15 UTC 2006
Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> michael at knox.net.nz said:
>> Should be ignored by the QA script:
>> lineak_xosdplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin Are in the
>> owners.list, however the name differs from the subject of the review
>> request. Sub the "_" for a "-".
>
> At first, I had a list of BZ tickets for which the script could not determine
> the correct package name (file bzId_pkg.txt attached to the
> Extras/UsefulScripts wiki page). But I think it was a bad idea: very hard to
> maintain. I think the proper way to handle those is to fix the Summary line
> of the affected BZ tickets. Which I have done with the lineak* tickets.
Ok, I will fix up those bz reports then.
>> Re-Review is actually jed, which is in the owners.list
>
> Yup. Fixed the script so that it groks this one too.
Just saw that ;)
>> kimdaba has been replaced by kphotoalbum, which is in the owners.list
>
> But there still is a kimdaba package with a full devel branch... So
> something is wrong somewhere...
Rex is looking into it I believe.
>> libgsf113 appears to have been removed from cvs, repos and owners.list
>
> This one has been blacklisted now.
>
Nice!
Thanks
Michael
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list