[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: qgit in Fedora Extras



On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 07:16 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Pavel Roskin píše v Po 06. 03. 2006 v 12:36 -0500:
> >>
> >> 4) git-arch should require tla or baz, not just tla.  They are
> >> compatible, but tla is obsolete and unmaintained, as far as I know.
> 
> That's also not true.  tla is maintained, 1.3.4 was just released and it's
> also maintained in Fedora Extras.  If the baz maintainer wants to add a
> Provides: tla, then that might work.  But otherwise, git-arch depending on
> tla is absolutely fine.
> 
*irony* This is the traditional place to create a virtual package :-)
tla Provides: arch
baz Provides: arch

- tla is (Tom Lord's Arch) so it's just an implementation of arch.
- baz does not provide tla.  baz's goals are to be an arch
implementation with an improved commandline ui.  It shares many but not
all of tla's command line options.

I don't know how git uses tla but depending on the subset of commands
used it's possible that git really does require tla and not baz.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]