[Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 13 23:38:48 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181369
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-03-13 18:38 EST -------
Naming Guidlines say post release snapshots are release.alpha. In your case,
Release would be 1.%{snap}cvs%{?dist}
rpmlint and the qa script found these:
Needs work:
* The package should contain the text of the license
(wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines)
* The package contains libtool archive files (*.la)
(wiki: PackagingGuidelines#StaticLibraries)
W: libedit non-standard-group System/Libraries
W: libedit-devel non-standard-group Development/C
The group specified in your spec file is not valid.
The closest match in rpm's GROUPS file is System Environment/Libraries for both.
W: libedit incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.9-20060103cvs 2.9-20060103cvs.1.fc5
Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with
the current version of your package.
E: libedit library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libedit.so.0.0.17
E: libedit library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libedit.so.0.0.17
This package contains a library and provides no %post or %postun scriptlet
containing
a call to ldconfig.
W: libedit-debuginfo objdump-failed
Executing objdump on this file failed, all checks could not be run.
Not sure about this one. The debuginfo package seems to have been made correctly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list