[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)

Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 19:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Yeah, we might have grown so far that we need to limit access in CVS a
bit more. We probably need to "add layers of control and management and
procedures" to make everything more safe.

Err, careful. Personally I'd like to encourage more collective ownership
in Extras. Locking things off would put a damper on this.

What really needs to happen is simply make it impossible to bypass the
commit emails.

+1 (+10 actually) As a sponsor I use the commit emails to monitor people I sponsored both for mistakes and unfortunatly also for bad intent. Unless my memory fails me I've sometime ago ctrl-C'd a cvs activity because I made a mistake. The changes however had already hit CVS, but due to the CTRl-C a commit mail never got send, thats bad!



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]