[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: GNOME packages that need review?



GNOME only? If you'll consider gtkmm I have a couple waiting... namely
bit, bitgtkmm and papyrus (a GnomeCanvas C++ replacement for Gtkmm).

Michael A. Peters wrote:
> I'm looking for some gnome packages that need review.
> I'd rather they not be mono packages, I want to watch some of them be
> reviewed first (feel free to put me on the cc list if you are submitting
> a mono package).
> 
> I'm looking through the FE-NEW bugs trying to find some GNOME packages
> that need review, but it isn't always so easy to find.
> 
> Note that I am not a sponsor, so I can't approve packages that need a
> sponsor - but I can comment on them.
> 
> So - what gnome specific packages need some reviewer time?
> 
> Maybe a page for gnome packages needing review should go in the gnome
> SIG. Should I just add a place for gnome packages that need review to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/GNOME (similar to games being
> packaged on the games SIG page)?
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]