scientific license - fedora compatible?

Tue May 23 05:57:56 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 02:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> * they are opposed to forks and free redistribution, they want to be 
>   acknowledged for the work and also keep control on it. That also goes 
>   against free software.

That sounds like the very definition of proprietary software to me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060523/434faf5d/attachment.sig>