[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?



On 23/05/06, Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> wrote:
Which brings us the a point which we have been over and over again. We
could really use a Non Free or Non Commercial repo for stuff like this,
I know we have the repo which may not be named, but the may not be named
is exactly the problem, if we want to cater as wide an audience as
possible (and IMHO we do) we could really use a Non Commercial repo.

It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
way as FE, as far as I can tell - it would be really nice to have a
repo for non-commercial stuff not allowed in extras, let's called it
Luvna, which uses the same infrastructure as FE, and which is open to
contributors.

j.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]