[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?



Jonathan Underwood wrote:

> On 23/05/06, Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl>
> wrote:
>> Which brings us the a point which we have been over and over again. We
>> could really use a Non Free or Non Commercial repo for stuff like this,
>> I know we have the repo which may not be named, but the may not be named
>> is exactly the problem, if we want to cater as wide an audience as
>> possible (and IMHO we do) we could really use a Non Commercial repo.
> 
> It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
> way as FE, as far as I can tell - 

What makes you say that?  At least from my point of view, it's pretty close.

-- Rex


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]