[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?



On 23/05/06, Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr> wrote:
That's strange. It seems to me that this practice is explicitly taken into
account in the point 4. at
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php

    Accordingly, an open-source license must guarantee that source be
    readily available, but may require that it be distributed as pristine
    base sources plus patches. In this way, "unofficial" changes can be
    made available but readily distinguished from the base source.

Indeed. Seems the wikipedia entry is off beam.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]