PHP packaging guidelines

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Fri May 26 03:28:07 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 22:00 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> At this point my vote is for /usr/share/.  Why does /var/www/* even
> exist?

Yes, putting web apps in /var/www/ is just flat out wrong for at least
two reasons I can think of:

/var/www is where local content goes. Similar to /usr/local, nothing
in /var/www should ever be placed there or modified by the package
manager. (Yes, its arguable as to if /var/www is the right place for
this stuff. This argument still applies to wherever the "right place"
may be)

Executables of any kind, whether they be binaries or scripts, simply
don't belong anywhere in /var, period. They belong somewhere in /usr,
which the truly obsessively paranoid can mount readonly, protecting all
binaries.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060525/5ca7e074/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list