[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Naming guidelines question




Rex Dieter wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> Also on the same page it talks about release candidates versioning and
>> it advices to use the final version this will become as version (agreed)
>> and to use the following as release:
>> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
>>
>> so we get:
>> 0.1.rc1
> ...
>> Where as I have always used and have seen others use (mostly):
>> 0.rc1.1
> ...
>> Is it ok
>> to use my own discretion here, both for my own packages and when
>> reviewing? Or should things always be done as:
>> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} ?
> 
> No, yes, respectively.
> 

Hmm,

shortest answer ever, and that is no, yes because?

Regards,

Hans


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]