[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Housekeeping (Was Re: FE Package Status of Sep 4, 2006)



Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
28 Packages not present in the development repo
-> most of them probably should be marked as dead.package in cvs. If
they get re-submitted later they should go though a full review again.

Be careful with this. Some of these packages were recently built, but didn't make it to the repo in time for the report (wfut, for example)

3 packages which have not yet been FE-APPROVED
-> heck, why?

#189375 (Maelstrom) moved from Core to Extras quite a while ago, and per the owner's request is now undergoing a formal review. There's a minor licensing question that has been pushed upstream and we're waiting for a response.

--Mike


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]