Any reason arj is not part of extras?

Tue Sep 5 20:47:15 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 22:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Is there any reason why arj (the clasic archiver) is not part of FE?
> See: http://arj.sourceforge.net/
[...]
> I'm asking because if there isn't any reason then I will probably
> package arj.

In case you do, I have a local not-really-used package of it - feel free
to grab it if you find something useful there:
http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/arj-3.10.22-0.2.src.rpm