[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora

On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 08:07 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I still see no resolution or any solution in sight for the fact that
> > most packages which currently own /usr/share/omf don't require
> > scrollkeeper and that thus scrollkeeper owning /usr/share/omf now isn't
> > any help at all, and thus all the filed bugs are a bit bogus.
> It's not necessarily that the bugs aren't bogus, it's just not immediately
> clear what the best fix/resolution is for packages that don't Requires:
> scrollkeeper.

Well, if a package has omf files, they should have Requires(post) &
Requires(postun) on scrollkeeper.  Which prevents scrollkeeper from
being removed from the system, unless this behavior has changed in

Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]