[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Any reason arj is not part of extras?




Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 22:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> Is there any reason why arj (the clasic archiver) is not part of FE?
>> See: http://arj.sourceforge.net/
> [...]
>> I'm asking because if there isn't any reason then I will probably
>> package arj.
> 
> In case you do, I have a local not-really-used package of it - feel free
> to grab it if you find something useful there:
> http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/arj-3.10.22-0.2.src.rpm
> 
> 
> 

Thanks,

It was a good start, if you're interested the FE review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205878

Regards,

Hans


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]