Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
Garrick Staples
garrick at usc.edu
Tue Sep 12 19:37:08 UTC 2006
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:01:46AM +0530, Rahul alleged:
> Ville Skytt? wrote:
>
> >
> >By the way, I don't have the impression that packagers are expected to
> >make sure that upgrades like directly from FC(x) to FC(x+2) without
> >stopping at FC(x+1) do work in the first place. Other opinions?
> >
>
> We definitely need to make sure that works. Many uses skip releases
> because they dont want to upgrade so soon and they didnt find any
> benefits in the latest release or there are some regressions and things
> like that. Upgrade paths to newer releases should always be as smooth as
> possible (not just between x and x+2).
Ditto. All upgrade paths should work correctly.
--
Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator
University of Southern California
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060912/4a3b2c72/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list