[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild

I'd be willing to take over straw (as I am one of the maintainers of
straw), but am currently not an extras contributor.  I looked over the
process and it seems like most of it is based on putting a new package
in to extras.  Since this is just taking over the maintainership of a
package, is there a different path to take?


On 9/18/06, Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi> wrote:

The deadline for the FE mass rebuild for FC6 was today, 153 packages
which are still in the devel (package) repo have not had their
needs.rebuild file treated in CVS.

- not-treated.txt: the 153 packages above
- not-treated-already-removed.txt: not treated, but already removed
- not-treated-deps.txt: packages that have dependencies to the above or
  subpackages of the above, but are not listed in the above

The not-treated-deps.txt list is informational -- it may contain false
positives and lack some packages, and it does not take build
dependencies into account.  Maintainers of packages listed in it may
want to look into it anyway.

Cleanup of packages listed in not-treated.txt from the devel package
repo will start today.  Changing their status to orphaned and removing
them from comps will be done a bit later, and packages that have
dependencies to those removed will be cleaned up incrementally in the
next few days.  Package dirs in CVS will be taken care of later, but
anyway I suppose before FC-6 is branched.

fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list redhat com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]