[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: librsync orphaned

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:11:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> A kind of AWOL process indirectly was started when the mass rebuild was
> announced (that was more then three weeks ago). If maintainers didn't
> showe up to rebuild their stuff -> packages considered mostly orphaned
> (at least *if* the packager didn't rebuild one of his packages and seems
> to be AWOL by common sense -- e.g. no other commits in the past weeks,
> no posts on this mailing list and stuff like that). Other people should
> be able to take over the packages quickly now in time to get the tree in
> shape before FC6. E.g. announce it in the wiki and on the list that you
> want to take over a package, wait two or three days, recheck if packager
> is still AWOL, take it over. If the packager shows up again in the next
> weeks -> give him his package back.
> Just to be sure: That just my opinion. But I'd say if the other
> FESCo-Members agree with this or a slightly adjusted variant of above
> scheme let's just start using it.

and also:

> s/take it over/& as comaintainer for some weeks before you take it over
> completely/

The above (as amended) is fine with me.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]