[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras



On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 21:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Chris Weyl schrieb:
> > On 9/19/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info> wrote:
> >> Well, they only get removed from the cvsextras group. We can re-add them
> >> easily later at any point without much overhead if we want to. Call that
> >> process "'inactive' flag"
> > I think the question lurking in the background is: would they need to
> > go through the sponsorship process again, or would a "please readd me"
> > note to the list do?
> 
> I think it should decided on a case-by-case basis.

Hmm, I don't see any reason for doing this.

>  If ignacio, mpeters
> or some trusted redhat people show up again with a good explanation why
> they were AWOL -> just re-add then. In other cases -> sponsorship.
IMO, it should simply be: "AWOL and you're out" (Less aggressively
formulated "Your account has expired").

For well-reputed packagers, it should not be much of a problem to pass
through the accounting process quickly again. 

Ralf




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]