[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?




Matthias Saou schrieb:
> Hans de Goede wrote :
>> The alternative is to submit a new supertuxkart package which obsoletes 
>> tuxkart, question will this cause automatic upgrades of tuxkart to 
>> supertuxkart?
> This would definitely be best.

+1

>[...] 
> Now the real question is : Do you need to go through the new package
> submission process? 

I think this once again needs to be handled on a case-by-case basis:

If upstream changed a lot of stuff or if the spec file was heavily
reworked -> new review.

If it's more like a regular update with a name-change -> announce it on
fedora-extras list and attach a spec-file diff so interested people can
quickly skim over it and veto if they see blockers. If everything is
quiet for 48 hours -> just import it,request branches, ...

CU
thl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]