[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pan orphaned - willing to volunteer for maintainership



On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:51:50 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:

> Question:
> What should be done? There are 2 possible routes I see: a) Keeping the
> beta / development upstream and doing a pan FE update rebuild from 0.99 ->
> 0.113.
> b) Increasing the epoch to get the same stable release version of FE5 and
> FE4 into devel / soon to be released FE6.
> 
> This is a call for votes - especially by those of you using Pan.

Hello Alexander,

I'm a light user of pan (two server cfg with about 30 groups in each). 
I've never tried the new beta releases, so I'm not really in the position
to know how usable it is.  That said, I'm fairly content with sticking
with 0.14 stable, then doing an update once 1.0 hits.

Btw, with option B above, why use an epoch?  I'd say if you go that
route, just "revert" cvs back to an older release.  It's just development.
Testers can deal with that type of breakage :)




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]