[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Undefined non-weak symbol from rpmlint



Mamoru Tasaka wrote:

> I am currently reviewing toped :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200
> 
> In the review process, I checked the binary rpm rebuilt by rpmlint
> as "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm", and the result was clean.
> However, once I install toped and try "rpmlint toped", I get lots
> of "undefined non-weak symbol" complaint like:
> 
> W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0
> wxEVT_LOG_ERRMESSAGE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
> /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 CmdList W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
> /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_FUNC_BROWSER W: toped
> undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 Properties W: toped
> undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM
> W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0
> _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
> /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev
> ............................
> 
> So my question is:
> B. Are these complaints BLOCKERs for approving this package?

Probably.  It should at least be looked into.

-- Rex


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]