Undefined non-weak symbol from rpmlint

[Patrice Dumas]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:08:04PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> So my question is:
> A. why is these complaints suppressed by "rpmlint ***.i386.rpm" ? Is this a default
>    of rpmlint?

No, this test can only be done on installed packages. You could have
a look at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00569.html

> B. Are these complaints BLOCKERs for approving this package?

In my opinion it isn't. But upstream should be warned and pointed at 
ldd -r output on the files/libs.

--
Pat