[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-28



buildsys fedoraproject org wrote :

> UNKNOWN OWNER (possibly Core package):

Since all of these aren't directly relevant to Extras, I'm assuming
they aren't reaching their maintainers like they should, so...

>     audit
>       FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.2.7-4.fc5 > 0:1.2.7-2)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208532

>     device-mapper
>       FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2)
>       FC4-updates > FC6 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.07-1.1)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208533

>     eclipse-changelog
>       FC4 > FC6 (1:2.0.1_fc-21 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)
>       FC5-updates > FC6 (1:2.1.0_fc-2 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208534

>     lvm2
>       FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1)

FC6 not affected.

>     mozilla
>       FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4)
>       FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5)

FC6 not affected (now that firefox from Core obsoletes mozilla).

>     perl-Net-DNS
>       FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535

>     quagga
>       FC4-updates > FC5-updates (0:0.98.6-1.fc4 > 0:0.98.6-1.FC5)

FC6 not affected.

>     tar
>       FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.15.91-1.FC5 > 0:1.15.91-1)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208536

I hope these minor (but important) rebuilds will make it into the final
FC6 tree so that we have the cleanest possible upgrade path.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2699.fc6
Load : 0.32 0.28 0.27


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]