Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2007-02-14

[Michael Thomas]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "DL" == Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> writes:
> 
> DL> This could have been communicated better, to say the least.
> 
> There was a thread about on fedora-devel-list; the end result of that
> thread was that tcl was being backed off.  There was even discussion
> about whether epoch had been bumped properly.  (It was.)
> 
> This certainly should have been announced on fedora-maintainers, but
> at least it was discussed with the community in some sense.
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-February/msg00506.html

Where would be the right place to announce this sort of thing?  It seems 
like we have 3 redundant lists where it could be posted: 
fedora-extras-list, fedora-maintainers-list, fedora-devel-list

--Wart