[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2007-02-14



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"DL" == Denis Leroy <denis poolshark org> writes:

DL> This could have been communicated better, to say the least.

There was a thread about on fedora-devel-list; the end result of that
thread was that tcl was being backed off.  There was even discussion
about whether epoch had been bumped properly.  (It was.)

This certainly should have been announced on fedora-maintainers, but
at least it was discussed with the community in some sense.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-February/msg00506.html

Where would be the right place to announce this sort of thing? It seems like we have 3 redundant lists where it could be posted: fedora-extras-list, fedora-maintainers-list, fedora-devel-list

--Wart


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]