Data Packages Guideline

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Mar 2 20:44:41 UTC 2007


On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 10:24 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Of course, it's Immutable.  Would someone with access to it care to make
> the change and let me know so I can update the Games SIG page?  Thanks! 
> Suggested text follows, edit as you see fit:
> 
I've added this as a draft guideline so the Packaging Committee can look
at it and approve it as an update to the Guidelines.  If you'd like to
push it forward, that would be excellent.  Basically, it needs
discussion on the fedora-packaging at redhat.com list to iron out any
problems, new drafts made addressing those issues, and then the
Packaging Committee will vote on it either on list or during a weekly
Tuesday meeting.
  http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DataPackages

If you can guide it through the comments and initial revisions I'll get
it onto the agenda.

Thanks,
-Toshio

> -----------------------
> Exceptions for large data-only packages (games, etc)
> 
> Omit the {%dist} tag from the release number, and specify the package as
> noarch. Build the package for devel only, then add a copy request here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RepoRequests
> 
> This will make the package available to the Fedora released you desire,
> but save rebuild time, bandwidth and repository mirror disk space.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20070302/a9568b29/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list