Data Packages Guideline

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 20:14 +0100, Axel Thimm a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:28:45AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 09:35 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> > If it's 100% process it should be in Extras/ rather than Packaging/  ...
> > So no need to get it approved by the Packaging Committee -- just needs
> > to find a good home under Extras/
> 
> could you perhaps extend it to mention firmwares and fonts as further
> examples for package that should not carry %dists and be the same
> cross-distribution (and also handled the same)?

Please don't - fontconfig logic can be very different from distribution
to distribution and release to release, fonts are *not* a good
cross-distribution candidate unless you want to promote gigantic
scriptlets

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20070303/db522802/attachment.sig>