[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 00:21:19 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-03-26 20:21 EST -------
> 1. 20080318 is out, perhaps update to that before importing?
done
> 2. The
> Source0: %{URL}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
> doesn't seem to work with spectool.
This is a spectool problem. Open a spectool bug if you care (I don't)
> Why not just replace %{URL} with the URL. Do you expect it to keep changing?
I suck at keeping URLs in sync. The less I have to manage the better I feel (I
still remember the 13-package gfs rebuild for upstream move with dread)
> Why not replace %{archivename} with the more standard %{name}-src-%{release} ?
Standard is in the eye of the beholder. I maintain and saw many packages that
used %{archivename}
Anyway package is now imported, thanks for the review
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-fonts-bugs-list
mailing list