[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416





--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-01-22 10:06:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> 1. I see.  Sorry, new to fonts.

np, still documenting this

> 2. Ahhh.  Makes sense.  Should %{name}-fonts-common then be required by {%name}
> but not the other way round?

%{name} should require the font packages, and they will drag in common

> 3. rpmlint will yell about that.

rpmlint is not always right. Ask skvidal on irc if you don't believe me.
Provides: oldname is only necessary if other packages depend on oldname and you
don't want them to change

> 4. Not sure what I would say, honestly.

I know, probably need to ask on the oflb mailing list what a good description
would be (or find one on wikipedia)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.