[Bug 481279] New: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279

           Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for
                    %{fontname}-common-fonts
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
Attempting yum update of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common fails sating conflict against
baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2.13

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.2.15

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum update
2.
3.

Actual results:
Reports conflict eror described above

Expected results:
Successful update

Additional info:
in the %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common section of the .spec file, should
there be an obsoletes %{fontname}-common-fonts < 2.2.13(or is it 2.2.14 -
common-fonts was last in version 2.2.13).

I also noticed that when I had 2.2.13 installed, there was a
baekmuk-fonts-common version 2.2.10 still installed, and presumably that should
have been obsoleted by a previous update?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.