Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies

[Roozbeh Pournader]

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
<nicolas.mailhot at gmail.com> wrote:
> No, I'm saying completeness should not be a requirement to create a new
> language group, but the aim should be to help people identify the
> missing bits so they can ping someone else (like you:;)) to provide
> them.

Got it. I guess this really means I should try to document the
process, like the great documentation I'm seeing at the fonts sig!
(not that i can reach the quality ;))

Roozbeh