fontconfig questions

Paul Lange palango at gmx.de
Sun Feb 8 14:34:43 UTC 2009


Am Freitag, den 06.02.2009, 12:03 -0300 schrieb Paul Lange:
> > I'm not sure that:
> > "the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma,
> > and Andale Sans UI" is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute
> > for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were
> > clearly derivatives of other fonts, or that claimed same (not
> > reminiscent) metrics.
> 
> OK, I removed the substitution rules.
> 
> > > I set the fontconfig-prefix of the sans-serif one to 61 (only latin) and
> > > of the monospace to 64 (only latin, only regular). Any comments on this?
> > 
> > You can probably be more conservative with sans-serif
> 
> Done this to and submitted a review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527

Sorry, wrong link. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/attachments/20090208/84eace12/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-fonts-list mailing list