packaging a lib which needs to be compiled in different ways for different users
Hugo Cisneiros
hugo at devin.com.br
Wed Jul 5 20:27:42 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:00, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any objections?
> >
> > Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode,
> > crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part
> > into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and
> > if one project can use another's opcode it can do so?
>
> Erm, no I think the effort needed to make that work is not worth the gain.
+1
> Regards,
> Hans
--
[]'s
Eitch
http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds
More information about the Fedora-games-list
mailing list