[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-05-10 03:06:53 EDT ---
This is a simple packaging of macros.ghc which is currently bundled with the
main large ghc package.


Here is the review:

 +:ok, !:needs attention,  NA: not applicable

MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[NA] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
[NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs
[NA] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[!] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.

%config taken care of by patch 6 above

[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

SHOULD Items:
[NA] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.


Please apply the attached fix for the rpmlint warning.

Package is APPROVED by petersen

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.