From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 06:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010650.n116oK3l005437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #3 from Jerry Amundson 2009-02-01 01:50:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > That tidbit is messing up seriously quite a chunk of a startup and surely a > lots of stuff "out in the field". This seems to be an man page issue, not an issue with binaries. The "messing up" is likely something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 06:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010647.n116ljFs004704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Jerry Amundson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |low --- Comment #2 from Jerry Amundson 2009-02-01 01:47:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > In : > bash-3.2-29.fc10.i386 > bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 > LANG=C man bash says: > ----------------------------------------- > source: > ...... > When bash is not in posix mode, the current directory is > searched if no file is found in PATH. > ----------------------------------------- > > However with man-pages-ja-20081015-1.fc10, man bash > says (in ja_JP): > ----------------------------------------- > source: > ...... > bash ? posix ????????????PATH ????????? > ?????????????????????????????? > ----------------------------------------- > This is quite opposite. What is the opposite? The en/ja man page descriptions, or the command behaviour? > Actually with bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11: > ----------------------------------------- > $ rpm -q bash > bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 > $ ls -al eval.sh > -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 323 2009-01-27 21:59 eval.sh > $ sh -c ". eval.sh" > sh: line 0: .: eval.sh: file not found > ----------------------------------------- > i.e. in posix mode source in sh does not search for the current > directory any more sh is posix mode, so the above is correct. $ sh -c ". eval.sh" sh: line 0: .: eval.sh: file not found $ bash -c ". eval.sh" $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 06:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010659.n116xQwc014080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-01 01:59:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What is the opposite? The en/ja man page descriptions, or the command > behaviour? Please check the title and the component of this bug report :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 07:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010723.n117Nvsm019023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-01 02:23:56 EDT --- A little while ago there was a post on fedora-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-February/msg00016.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ hi Great list, I just find that the libgnome-2.24.1-7.fc10 has been disabled "esd" when it is built. This has caused the "gnome_sound_play()" doesn't work and some package such as "stardict" cannot play sound. Why should we disable esd in libgnome? Could we enable it? ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 15:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011503.n11F3sfV010493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com Component|alsa-oss |libgnome AssignedTo|jima at jima.tk |rstrode at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 10:03:53 EDT --- So the problem is that libgnome tries to use OSS for sound output rather than libesd. The former does not work with PulseAudio, the latter does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 17:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] no lang/kbd selection for Live System User after logout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011729.n11HT9ka004381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-01 12:29:09 EDT --- Not sure I understand exactly a) what is wrong and b) what change is requested here. Would it help if we made liveuser show up in the user list (instead of hidden behind Other...) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 23:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] no lang/kbd selection for Live System User after logout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012346.n11NkZEf009916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-01 18:46:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Not sure I understand exactly a) what is wrong and b) what change is requested > here. The behaviour changed from F10. There is not too much to understand one can just compare and see that now after logging out there is no choice of lang/kbd available as there was before. I dunno how that was done, but given that is it there for initial login it should be possible to repeat it after logging out too? a) see Summary. b) see above > Would it help if we made liveuser show up in the user list (instead of hidden > behind Other...) ? That would lower the pain, but why not bring back the F10 behaviour? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020142.n121gptB031140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-01 20:42:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please check the title and the component of this bug report :) Yep, and that's why I've changed the severity down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020301.n1231irw008781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #6 from Michal Jaegermann 2009-02-01 22:01:43 EDT --- > Yep, and that's why I've changed the severity down. In my understanding the severity is not in discrepancies of assorted variants of manpages but it lies in a potential breakage of various scripts which were written and deployed "locally". Changes in API, and this is one, should not be taken lightly. It is true that it not hard to fix those, if you realize what happened, but so far at least scripts used by /etc/init.d/network broke and, AFAIK, they are still broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020323.n123Nj5V013313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-01 22:23:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > In my understanding the severity is not in discrepancies of assorted variants > of manpages but it lies in a potential breakage of various scripts which were > written and deployed "locally". Changes in API, and this is one, should not be > taken lightly. > > It is true that it not hard to fix those, if you realize what happened, but so > far at least scripts used by /etc/init.d/network broke and, AFAIK, they are > still broken. I'm not sure how that breakage is related to the mistranslation in Japanese manpages since they could see difference between the description in manpages and the actual behavior before pushing something to public though, translations is always likely to be mistranslated or be inconsistent translations comparing to the original one by changing APIs etc, because upstream doesn't maintain it. particularly in the case of documentations and manpages not using something like gettext to detect changes in the original one. I don't think a kind of this issue is a higher-serverity so that there are a workaround to see a behavior i.e. looking at the English manpages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 05:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020559.n125xwt6011851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #21 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-02-02 00:59:54 EDT --- I have taken over this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020726.n127Q7B0028949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #8 from Michal Jaegermann 2009-02-02 02:26:07 EDT --- > I'm not sure how that breakage is related to the mistranslation in Japanese Do you want to say that during a startup when a breakage occures bash is in a posix mode? I am not sure how but it appears that we are talking about two different things. I understood the original report that something got mixed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020754.n127sSrR002465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 02:54:28 EDT --- To make this bug more clearer: * As I said in comment 0 Japanese man pages for bash need fixing. I am not saying that bash binary should be fixed. * What became critical now is that Japanese bash man page says that *in* posix mode source command _does_ search current path. This was not a problem on bash 3.x, because - In English bash man page, there was (and also is) no mention about how source behaves *in* posix mode for current path English bash man page explains how source behaves in *non*-posix mode only - And actually sh 3.x searched current path *in* posix mode But with bash 4.x, in posix mode sh no longer searches current path - This behavior is "correct" because English man page does not say anything how source behaves in posix mode for current path - But Japanese man page _does_ say that sh searches current path in posix mode. So now not only there is misinterpretation on Japanese man page, but also current Japanese man page says what is _against_ what sh in posix mode behaves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020802.n12822fT009953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-02 03:02:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Do you want to say that during a startup when a breakage occures bash is in a > posix mode? I am not sure how but it appears that we are talking about two > different things. I understood the original report that something got mixed > up. I'm just saying that how this mistranslation bug impacts even though there are a workaround? I don't know when you were aware of you've got something mixed up though, if something is broken, it should be a bug in it and even if author of it was referring to this manpage during development, they shouldn't push their software without certain testing. basically manpage issues is highly unlikely to be set higher-priority, particularly with translated manpages. Anyway I'm trying to have a time to fix this though, won't happens soon maybe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483530] New: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The Lohit Bengali font has dashes instead of glyphs for the actual Bengali characters in the following positions: U+09F2 BENGALI RUPEE MARK U+09F3 BENGALI RUPEE SIGN U+09F4 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE U+09F5 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR TWO U+09F6 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR THREE U+09F8 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE LESS THAN THE DENOMINATOR U+09F9 BENGALI CURRENCY DENOMINATOR SIXTEEN Either the glyphs should be designed and added to the font, or the dashes should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483530] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020942.n129gN4k028662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-02 04:42:22 EDT --- Yep, I noticed that recently. I am trying to get these and such missing glyphs added to the font asap. Not sure why there were dashes put on those places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021823.n12INjK7028472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #11 from Michal Jaegermann 2009-02-02 13:23:45 EDT --- > - This behavior is "correct" because English man page does not > say anything how source behaves in posix mode for current path Is indeed bash in a posix mode during a startup? This is not clear to me and if not then errors in a service network are bash errors. That what I understood is the original report really about and that translation discrepancies really point to some mixups in an implementation. If I misread that then we are talking about different things. The other issue is that even if you are _allowed_ to change an undocumented behaviour is it really _wise_ to do so after so many years of bash in use. Is there some requirement which forces such move? Various destructive actions could be substituted in the argument above because nothing said before that something of that sort will not happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 21:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] iso-codes updates for Serbian locales In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022143.n12Lh5K9008479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Aillon 2009-02-02 16:43:05 EDT --- Yes, I've sent patches that way and have gotten them accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022323.n12NNm3F027708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #51 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this conf, check if the Chinese are > not antialias within the range. Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have antialias enabled? ===== The two are somehow overlapped: 11 >= pixelsize <= 17 OR 8 >= pixelsize <= 12 becomes 8 >= pixelsize <- 17 which font sizes 8 - 17 would have antialias disabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022344.n12NiCVQ031691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #52 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:44:12 EDT --- This makes when uming pixelsize < 17, has antialias and hinting off. Please kindly test: ===== AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE false AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 17 true true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 17 false false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022348.n12NmDdC009143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:48:12 EDT --- Patched in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030020.n130KOhT014991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #330210|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #53 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 19:20:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330696) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330696) Screen with .conf in last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030024.n130OsZQ006253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-02 19:24:53 EDT --- thai-scalable-fonts is the correct new naming? Assuming so I will create the new cvs module and import http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts.spec http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts-0.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm which looks ok to me on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030112.n131CmeZ023691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030118.n131IDlW024669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-02 20:18:13 EDT --- Better bring it up on fedora-devel-list if you are unsure, otherwise just file a bug to bash on bugzilla. discussing about it here won't make it clearer so that no persons in charge isn't in Cc at the moment. and bugzilla isn't a place to discuss IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030154.n131sjCb021882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-02 20:54:45 EDT --- hmm, so are you saying that "gothic" isn't a family name or just get rid of it because of duplicate to the project name? then what I should do in this package for new policy is just to make the package name lower-case. I'd a bit prefer vlgothic-proportional-fonts rather than vlgothic-p-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030213.n132DTlH025336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 21:13:28 EDT --- 1 & 2 have been resolved: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466859] Dynamic order of candidate frequency. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030247.n132lhND031561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466859 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030249.n132nx2E031807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 21:49:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I think it is rather the user preference. Working on having user preferences in ibus-table. > However, it is a problem that preedit buffer is not restored and shown when > focus back in, which haven't been solved yet. Which version you are triaging? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030306.n1336gie011661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2009-02-02 22:06:41 EDT --- Hi bucchie73, I have a test build for ibus in koji. It might fix this problem. Please try it. Thanks. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100488 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030311.n133B8iD012529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 --- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-02-02 22:11:08 EDT --- Oops, I was talking about ibus-chewing. Does it also appear in ibus-table? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030328.n133SPLE007441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #54 from Baif 2009-02-02 22:28:22 EDT --- >1.Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. :( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing. >2.BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have >antialias enabled? Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated... >3. The two are somehow overlapped I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize". And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE LiveCD. How about yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030347.n133luAO022509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #55 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 22:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > :( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal > laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing. That' alright. >2.BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have > >antialias enabled? > Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other > fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated... The .conf in comment #52 should not affect global antialias configuration. > >3. The two are somehow overlapped > I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize". Hmm I should get back and check what is the differences. > And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE > LiveCD. I personally think whether antialias is enabled or not globally, should not be controlled by cjkuni-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030357.n133vT9Q024426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #56 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 22:57:29 EDT --- Still looking for extra testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030408.n1348xiP018742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 23:08:59 EDT --- Currently preedit is kept. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030519.n135JTeY000435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #5 from bucchie73 2009-02-03 00:19:28 EDT --- I tried these test packages in koji, it seems to work very fine. It was not a big problem, but I was not able to install ibus-gtk.i386 --------------------------------------------------------------- Error: Missing Dependency: libibus-gtk.so.0 is needed by package ibus-gtk-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030523.n135NExM001309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #57 from Baif 2009-02-03 00:23:14 EDT --- Maybe, the reason for disabling antialias for other fonts is: Uming has alias as Serif San fonts in the other conf file. And KDE/Qt apps vs GNOME/GTK apps have different fonts display on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030530.n135UY0u010738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #6 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 00:30:34 EDT --- You should download all rpms (ibus, ibus-gtk, ibus-qt) and update them together. BTW, I think your system is x86_64. You need download rpms suffixes with x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 06:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030605.n136584K017609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #7 from bucchie73 2009-02-03 01:05:08 EDT --- I am sorry to write a sentence causing misunderstanding. I installed these packages. ibus-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.x86_64 ibus-debuginfo-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.x86_64 ibus-gtk-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.x86_64 ibus-qt-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.x86_64 It seems to work very fine. I was able to install ibus-gtk-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10.i386 before I updated it, but was not able to install ibus-gtk-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.i386 now. Is there any change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 06:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479974] useradd not accepting UTF8 string (unable to create username in local language/script) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030633.n136X89d022795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479974 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-03 01:33:07 EDT --- creating userid in utf8 will add difficulty in processing it @ console level(IM), but User Full Name we can create with UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 07:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030715.n137Fe9i023530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-03 02:15:39 EDT --- read the naming guidelines carefully; you'll see we try very hard to avoid unnecessary repetitions, and to get something close to what the font files declare in their metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 08:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030850.n138ohHA010726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 03:50:42 EDT --- Just to explain that AFAIK the only difference between the two faces is in the non-Japanese glyphs, so it only affects apps where the font is explicitly chosen, eg openoffice and user config of fonts in other apps. VL Gothic is a fixed width font (ie Latin glyphs are half-width of Japanese character, so good for monospace) VL PGothic is variable width in Latin glyphs (so more natural for sans,serif) (Japanese glyphs are always fixed and full width) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030921.n139Lbpt026640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 04:21:35 EDT --- It is imported and built now for rawhide: did the EOL process for the old package and added now one to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030936.n139asqb030416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #8 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 04:36:53 EDT --- You downloaded ibus's spec file has some problem. But it is not a big deal. I have fixed it. If you want, you could re-install ibus-gtk.i386 from fedora update repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030937.n139brKa022515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 04:37:53 EDT --- Fixed in 0.1.1.20090203-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030941.n139fvAs023539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #10 from bucchie73 2009-02-03 04:41:56 EDT --- Now I tried new build in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81323 I could install ibus-gtk-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10.i386 now, and all the problems were solved. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030953.n139rl57001653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #11 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 04:53:46 EDT --- *** Bug 481093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] ibus causes pidgin to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030953.n139rksM001626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 04:53:46 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 481693 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030953.n139rmjc001677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 481093, which changed state. Bug 481093 Summary: ibus causes pidgin to crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031003.n13A3GMM004229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 480889, which changed state. Bug 480889 Summary: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480889 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480889] ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031003.n13A3EVB004166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480889 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-03 05:03:13 EDT --- The default next engine hotkey is empty now. Fixed in 0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031020.n13AKNim008569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-03 05:20:22 EDT --- It seems that with baekmuk-ttf-XXX-2.2-19.fc11, cjkuni-XXXX-0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11 Japanese glyphs are shown correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031201.n13C1R4G002348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-03 07:01:26 EDT --- just a warning: FPC and fesco demanded for subpackages that contain fonts to be renamed foo-fonts, but the common subpackage does not contain any font and should keep its old naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031436.n13EanN8002903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 09:36:48 EDT --- Almost more than one month no response from package maintainer. And looks like I also lost now interest in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] no lang/kbd selection for Live System User after logout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031708.n13H8KSD015525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-03 12:08:20 EDT --- It wasn't clear to me so far that you are describing an f10->rawhide behaviour change. sounds like a bug then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040051.n140pdtB026605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #30 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 19:51:38 EDT --- There are .conf templates from package fontpackages. I applied from that. cjkuni-fonts is patched: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269 baekmuk-ttf-fonts is patched: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040052.n140qcR3021914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #58 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 19:52:38 EDT --- Wait for feedback from rawhide users: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 01:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040118.n141IOIu031358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 20:18:23 EDT --- latest; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040215.n142FGth008096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 21:15:15 EDT --- latest: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040240.n142e5nG012285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040245.n142jppE008074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |skvidal at fedoraproject.org Component|liberation-fonts |comps AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |notting at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 21:45:51 EDT --- hi rel-eng, please rename rpm in comps.xml from 'liberation-fonts' to 'liberation-fonts-compat': http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 03:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040352.n143qc4s026894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Component|fontconfig |cjkuni-fonts Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 22:52:37 EDT --- No comment from Behdad so can probably close this for now. Dunno if it is worth discussing the change of behaviour upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 05:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040550.n145oJr4007513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 00:50:18 EDT --- oops, i changed samyak-fonts-common also to samyak-common-fonts ok i will change it to samyak-fonts-common again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040831.n148VCHp002174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 03:31:11 EDT --- built it for rawhide with update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040935.n149ZfRF015700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 04:35:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > If the user is prompted, packages should be installed. > > Conversely, if there are no packages to be installed (as in this case), the user > *should not* be prompted. sorry for late reply i was working on some others bug of s-c-l so looks for this too It is prompting for "XX language support is not installed, do you want to install it?" and it is installing language support at the end (It is not prompting for package installation) also as per bug looks like adding extra overhead by checking using yum where packages are going to install or not before user wish as per suggestion s-c-l need to do all yum calculation, dependency check before actually need of it, which is big task so IMHO what is happening is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040948.n149mZee018137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796 --- Comment #11 from Tim Waugh 2009-02-04 04:48:34 EDT --- But it isn't correct! The prompt makes no sense at all in this case. Couldn't system-config-language use PackageKit to request the installation of whichever language support packages are required? That way, PackageKit can do the check to see if the package is already installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041029.n14AT4PW000807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 05:29:03 EDT --- lots of code already written for s-c-l with yum handling all these installation thing, It will require lots of changes in that case from installation side do PackageKit provide python API? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041105.n14B5qqo003039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796 --- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 06:05:51 EDT --- 1) It first checks wheather group is installed or not, 2) if it is not installed prompt user for group installation 3) and then install packages in group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041121.n14BLDGw006399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796 --- Comment #14 from Tim Waugh 2009-02-04 06:21:12 EDT --- Well, it isn't working because I get prompted but no packages are installed as a result. Here's how to install a package using PackageKit from Python: bus = dbus.SessionBus () obj = bus.get_object ("org.freedesktop.PackageKit", "/org/freedesktop/PackageKit") proxy = dbus.Interface (obj, "org.freedesktop.PackageKit") proxy.InstallPackageName (...) (See installpackage.py from system-config-printer for a real example, although that has compatibility code for an older interface as well.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041349.n14DnBDm009914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-04 08:49:11 EDT --- Ok, I see. Filed a package review for renaming. Bug#484042. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 19:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041919.n14JJ6BK001462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham 2009-02-04 14:19:05 EDT --- As the package maintainer, you can do that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484109] New: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: michal at harddata.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Before an update there were installed liberation-fonts-1.04.93-6.fc11 and liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-6.fc11. The current update "obsoleted" liberation-fonts and "replaced" it with liberation-fonts-common. In yum.log: Feb 04 12:55:50 Installed: liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-8.fc11.noarch Feb 04 12:58:20 Erased: liberation-fonts Only there are no actual fonts after these operations. It appears that the idea was to replace those with 'liberation-fonts-compat' package. A typo in specs? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.04.93-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042043.n14Khvtk021563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 15:43:57 EDT --- Yes, the latest liberation rawhide package releases are "strange" I'll probably won't be able to find the time soonish to try to understand them. Caius: how about you just follow the templates strictly, taking inspiration from how mgopen (or dejavu, or vera...) obsoleted cleanly their old monolithic fonts package, instead of trying to come up with a new obsoletion pattern? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 23:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484142] New: imsettings-applet warnings on Emacs startup in Gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: imsettings-applet warnings on Emacs startup in Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484142 Summary: imsettings-applet warnings on Emacs startup in Gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: beland at alum.mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=330937) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330937) Excerpt from .xession-errors when starting Emacs When starting Emacs from the Gnome menu, I got a ton of warnings in .xsession-errors, including things like: (imsettings-applet:2862): libimsettings-xim-WARNING **: Invalid entry [no symbol]: : "??" (imsettings-applet:2862): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_boxed_copy: assertion `src_boxed != NULL' failed (imsettings-applet:2862): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_boxed_free: assertion `boxed != NULL' failed I wouldn't want to see any warnings if everything is working properly. A complete log excerpt is attached. This is with: imsettings-0.105.1-2.fc10.x86_64 emacs-22.3-3.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050147.n151lqEH020815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466844, which changed state. Bug 466844 Summary: Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050148.n151m2E6020888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466430, which changed state. Bug 466430 Summary: Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050147.n151lpJ0020781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #13 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-04 20:47:50 EDT --- applied: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050148.n151m2Kn020859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-04 20:48:01 EDT --- applied: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484142] imsettings-applet warnings on Emacs startup in Gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050208.n15283T1024587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484142 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-04 21:08:02 EDT --- Thank you for your report. it was actually for debugging purpose. I can just disable that warning since it's likely to appear when current keyboard layout doesn't support a symbol. however the above two critical messages basically means a bug. so I'll have a look into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050216.n152GcwG022186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:16:37 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152L7ng029943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:06 EDT --- ibus-0.1.1.20090203-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152L9Bm029988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050222.n152MPAO030923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:22:24 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 06:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050644.n156iSHV007283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-05 01:44:27 EDT --- The package is now updated to new guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050842.n158gvL8031692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327312|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050844.n158i5lM026873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-05 03:44:05 EDT --- Rahul, could you apply the above suggested changes please to keep the review moving? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473837] couldn't switch layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052124.n15LOvqa002999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473837 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(psklenar at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-05 16:24:56 EDT --- This is unclear. What button is gray ? And what does 'mousemoving the layout mean ? What icon is being clicked on ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 04:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060449.n164n9lB002855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |caio at dejieshi.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-05 23:49:08 EDT --- Patch with reference of dejavu-fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 04:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484327] Key Summary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060454.n164sf4R003807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484327 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com, | |pnemade at redhat.com Component|scim-sinhala |m17n-db AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-05 23:54:41 EDT --- it is part of package m17n-db-sinhala, changing that you can do that easily just check /usr/share/m17n/si-wijesekera-preedit.mim, modify key summary submit updated file on here thats it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:07:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060507.n1657v3B005834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 06:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060628.n166S56a023258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |caio at dejieshi.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061250.n16CoNBb009115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-06 07:50:22 EDT --- anthy-9100g-1.fc11 or later has a dictionary contains JIS X 0213:2004 now. will backport after some testing. FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061256.n16Cu9aF012285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(masaki.chikama at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-06 07:56:07 EDT --- I can't reproduce this issue on anthy-9100g-1.fc11 though, can you also double-check it? if it works fine, I'll plan to ship it for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061301.n16D1PqY013633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061303.n16D3Z57012285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 208553] [ml_IN] font rendering in Qt applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061539.n16Fdr2F018348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208553 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061608.n16G8Ubc025075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:08:28 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061609.n16G92Dm025783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:09:01 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 17:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444814] Amharaic defaults to native input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061743.n16HhpPO015399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444814 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e+ --- Comment #12 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-06 12:43:49 EDT --- This should get mentioned in the F11 release notes, in the Internationalization section: The 'native' input method modules that used to be shipped with gtk2 have been moved to a separate gtk2-immodules package. If you've previously used 'native' GTK+ input methods, e.g. by setting the GTK_IM_MODULE environment variable, or by relying on GTK+ picking an input method based on the locale, you may have to install the gtk2-immodules package. Users of the default input method framework (scim/ibus) are not affected by this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071355.n17DtStu031674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796 --- Comment #10 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2009-02-07 08:55:27 EDT --- It seems at least the Finnish translation is updated in the current Rawhide gdm package, but I won't close this, since I'm not sure about other languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 17:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484513] New: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484513 Summary: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: alanfyoung at hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1b2) Gecko/20090128 Firefox/3.1-0.4.beta2.fc11 Minefield/3.1b2 Around 16:00 UTC today I issued the "yum update" command from a terminal on a freshly-installed F11 Alpha x86_64 system. yum informed me (amongst other things) that it would be: Installing: ibus i386 1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11 rawhide 407 k replacing ibus-pinyin.noarch 0.1.1.20081004-2.fc11 ibus x86_64 1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11 rawhide 414 k replacing ibus-chewing.x86_64 0.1.1.20081023-2.fc11 However, the command later failed with 100 Transaction Check Error messages, all of them ending "conflicts between attempted installs of ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.x86_64 and ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386". Issuing the command "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" and re-running "yum update" resulted in the removed package being re-downloaded and the process failing as before. Re-issuing he command "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" and running "yum -C update" failed with the message "Error Downloading Packages: ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386: Caching enabled but no local cache of //var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm from rawhide". Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "yum update" - fails as described above. 2. Run "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" 3. Run "yum update" again - this again fails as already described. 4. Re-run "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" 5. Run "yum -C update" - this too fails as described above. Actual Results: "yum update" fails to complete. Expected Results: "yum update" completes successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 03:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484536] New: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Various fonts in the smc-fonts package, especially smc-fonts-meera, which is installed on every Fedora machine because of being being "default" in compts, have default glyphs shaped like an R in circle for some Malayalam characters. For example, Meera has the following default glyphs in places that it should not have: U+0D44, U+0D62, U+0D63, U+0D71, U+0D72, U+0D73, U+0D74, U+0D79, U+0D7A, U+0D7B U+0D7C, U+0D7D, U+0D7E, U+0D7F Also, there are several default glyphs in places that Unicode may use for future encoding of Malayalam characters, like U+0D00 and U+0D29. All those R in cirlces should be removed from the font, to make the font Unicode-complying. Alternatively, Meera can be replaced by a standard font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080904.n1894MVE001569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 --- Comment #1 from Santhosh Thottingal 2009-02-08 04:04:21 EDT --- The following code points were added to Unicode 5.1 by Unicode consortium 0D7A MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU NN(???) 0D7B MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU N(???) 0D7C MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU RR(???) 0D7D MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU L(???) 0D7E MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU LL(???) 0D7F MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU K(???) Please note that these glyphs are already present in Malayalam(ml_IN) fonts and mapped to ? + ? + zwj, ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj respectively. Large amount of data encoded using this standard(5.0) is present in digital format. By duplicating the encoding by defining new code points for these glyphs, Unicode brought dual encoding issue for Malayalam. Dual encoding without canonical equivalence brings chaos to Unicode Malayalam including security issues. And it makes existing application buggy while handling Malayalam. So accepting these code points to our application should be done with extreme care. We should keep backward compatibility and at the same time we should avoid dual encoding. There are two options: a) Unicode consortium should define canonical equivalence between the existing representation and newly defined duplicate code points b) Unicode consortium should deprecate the new code points(this is recommended, since the new code points does not bring any advantage other than issues to existing data and application both in technical and security aspects ) It is because of this reason , Swathanthra Malayalam Computing(SMC), the FOSS developer community which develops/maintains these fonts decided to postpone adding these glyphs to fonts(Not only to fonts, but existing applications too) until Unicode resolve the above mentioned issues. SMC had already informed Unicode about the problems by the document No: L2/08-038. You can see a copy here http://wiki.smc.org.in/images/2/23/SMC_Unicode_5.1.pdf. If this bug is a serious concern for you, you may also contact Unicode consortium to resolve the issue asap. Unicode 5.1 compliance means backward compatibility to 5.0 and older versions also. If we want to keep backward compatibility we should keep the existing glyph-code-point mapping. At the same time if we duplicate those glyphs for another code point in the font, that is a serious issue. This bug should postponed till Unicode take any decision on this problem. Regarding other new code points in Unicode 5.1 version, we are planning to add those glyphs to fonts in their next versions(No font in Malayalam has those glyphs as of now). The R sign in the unassigned code point positions will be removed as and when Unicode defines characters for them in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081328.n18DSmw2023430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 CHIKAMA Masaki changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(masaki.chikama at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #4 from CHIKAMA Masaki 2009-02-08 08:28:47 EDT --- I rebuild anthy-9100g-2.fc11 using 'mock -r fedora-10-i386', and I can't reproduce the comment #2 any more. It seems that the problem has been solved on upstream. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 02:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484621] culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090247.n192lPs0018798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484621 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446451 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 02:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484621] New: culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484621 Summary: culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: culmus-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Since culmus-fonts has now been subpackaged for F11 it needs a compat subpackage for smooth updating from F10, etc. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): culmus-fonts-0.102-1.fc11 Actual results: No culmus-fonts-compat so can't upgrade. Expected results: culmus-fonts-compat which obsoletes previous culmus-fonts correctly. Additional info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090351.n193pL2G030840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|jakub at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Parag 2009-02-08 22:51:20 EDT --- This looks fixed now with update to glibc-2.9.90-3 in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477581] iok should avoid resizing when changing maps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090354.n193sFL9001257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477581 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-02-08 22:54:14 EDT --- Closing this for now. KLindly reopen this bug if still some problem is seen in iok-1.2.0 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090353.n193rbV7001194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Parag 2009-02-08 22:53:36 EDT --- Closing this for now. KLindly open new bug if still some problem is seen in iok-1.2.0 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] Translated to Brazilian Portuguese In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090352.n193qMNE031072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-02-08 22:52:22 EDT --- included in iok in F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484327] [si_LK] Key Summary needed for si-wijesekara-preedit keymap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090358.n193wZgM002071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484327 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Key Summary |[si_LK] Key Summary needed | |for si-wijesekara-preedit | |keymap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484621] culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090413.n194DsoM002273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484621 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] ibus-table : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090456.n194ujus011964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466850] The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090457.n194vYW3012094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090510.n195AlSY012050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Component|comps |wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |fangqq at gmail.com Summary|make wqy-zenhei-fonts |allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to |default in @chinese-support |be installed by default in |group |@chinese-support group QAContact|katzj at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 00:10:46 EDT --- Can we soften the font config so that wqy-zenhei-fonts can be installed by default by Chinese without taking over the whole desktop? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090525.n195PjAd014582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090525.n195PmKr014676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Bug 480885 depends on bug 466912, which changed state. Bug 466912 Summary: [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090529.n195TvbV017190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 00:29:56 EDT --- hi Jens I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more? As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to "serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu, uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484638] New: [pa_IN] Default TimeZone is not selected for (Indic) language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [pa_IN] Default TimeZone is not selected for (Indic) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484638 Summary: [pa_IN] Default TimeZone is not selected for (Indic) language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: while stated installation for Punjabi (pa_IN), Default city (time/zone) was America/New York, but it should be Asia/Kolkata. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.5.0.12-1.i386.rpm How reproducible: Evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. run installation in Punjabi (or Indic) language 2. goto timezone selection page 3. Actual results: Default selected time zone is America/New York Expected results: for Indic locale, it should be Aisa/Kolkata Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484638] [pa_IN] Default TimeZone is not selected for (Indic) language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090550.n195ovxN021021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484638 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-02-09 00:50:56 EDT --- previous fixed bug was #227625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090616.n196Guck025653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 01:16:55 EDT --- THanks, fixed in ibus-1.1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090616.n196Gwlh025713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 481095, which changed state. Bug 481095 Summary: ibus-anthy: pre-edit sometimes gets stuck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481095 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 481098 depends on bug 481693, which changed state. Bug 481693 Summary: Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Bug 481098 depends on bug 466871, which changed state. Bug 466871 Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090638.n196c02x029434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 01:37:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not > overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more? I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default. Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts > As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to > "serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled > glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu, > uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for > zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve? Eventually maybe. :) What about Ukai? Last I tested wqy-zenhei was still too aggressive in priority to coexist with cjkuni-fonts. Thanks for the information about ubuntu's defaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 07:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090704.n19749Km031448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-09 02:04:09 EDT --- santhosh, thanks for update chill characters are from 7A to 7F so if we are not supporting those characters we can simply keep blank at those position but adding shape ? which has different unicode value U+24c7 in those places make this font Unicode incompatible u+ 0d44 u+ 0d62 u+ 0d63 U+ 0d70 - wrong shape U+ 0d71 U+ 0d72 U+ 0d73 U+ 0d74 U+ 0d75 also above are some more places where unicode has given shapes then also meera has ? sign there this is wrong and it makes it unicode incompatible (some out of these are added in Unicode 5.1 in that case only blank is require) IMHO we do not need to put R shapes in Reserved spaces as those code point are already not implemented in any application (pango, qt), typing is also not allowed for those characters and adding those shapes in font increasing its size unnecessarily i think there is no harm in removing those shapes from font It will be very good if we can say Meera font is Unicode 5.0 compatible :) Roozbeh Thanks for notifying these thing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 07:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] New: after a language installation, ibus don't Enabled default language keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: after a language installation, ibus don't Enabled default language keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Summary: after a language installation, ibus don't Enabled default language keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After install a Language (pa_IN/Punjabi), when I tried to input Punjabi (press Ctrl-Space), ibus open Setup. But not enable default language layouts. Scim has this feature in old release. in Desktop, scim shows all Punjabi layouts, while using Punjabi installation and a Default layout (Inscript for Punjabi) selected. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11.i386 How reproducible: evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. login in new language with new user 2. ctrl-space (to input something) in any editor (or anywhere) 3. Actual results: ibus asked for setup, but not enabled layout by default for language Expected results: expecting default language layout enabled by default (as scim was doing) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 07:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484643] New: ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484643 Summary: ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: while using ibus, I locked the screen and tried to log-back (in a session). it was not allowing to log back to session as ibus enabled during lock-login screen, but there was no icon with it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11 How reproducible: Evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. eable ibus in session 2. lock the session 3. press Ctrl+Space (2-3 time) Actual results: lock screen takes input in local session, while not showing any sign to input method (enabled) Expected results: Either lock screen should not allow to get input from ibus or ibus should not work with lock screen. Additional info:h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090933.n199X1d4027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484650 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484650] New: ibus-table needs to be updated for new ibus C API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-table needs to be updated for new ibus C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484650 Summary: ibus-table needs to be updated for new ibus C API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,481098 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ibus's engine API changed with ibus-1.1.0. So the ibus-table needs to be updated for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090935.n199ZP82027744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484651] New: ibus-chewing needs to be updated for new ibus C API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-chewing needs to be updated for new ibus C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484651 Summary: ibus-chewing needs to be updated for new ibus C API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-chewing AssignedTo: dchen at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, dchen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,481098 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ibus's engine API changed with ibus-1.1.0. So the ibus-chewing needs to be updated for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484513] "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090938.n199cc2g028276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484513 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 04:38:38 EDT --- Huang Peng suggested splitting libibus.so.0* out of the main ibus package should fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090947.n199lufd031001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466857, which changed state. Bug 466857 Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090947.n199lsGa030942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 04:47:52 EDT --- This is fixed in current builds/releases, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484652] New: ibus-daemon does not start on login Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-daemon does not start on login https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484652 Summary: ibus-daemon does not start on login Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After the update to ibus-1.1.0, ibus-daemon no longer starts automatically. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. install rawhide 2. login to CIJK locale Actual results: ibus is not running Expected results: ibus should be running Additional info: Starting by hand with "ibus-daemon & ; export GTK_IM_MODULE=ibus" seems to be a workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484621] culmus-fonts needs compat package for upgrades In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090953.n199ruZ1032712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484621 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-09 04:53:55 EDT --- Added the -compat subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091416.n19EGWVc028138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #59 from Baif 2009-02-09 09:16:29 EDT --- How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091437.n19EbFLg031906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #60 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-09 09:37:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #59) > How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD? Enable rawhide repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091544.n19FiRlC014893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #5 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 10:44:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default. > > Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop > fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts ok, that's fine (zenhei had never overrode dejavu), I will change the settings when I update the fontconfig file to follow the new guideline (I am still not able to compile due to %{_fontdir} definition #478891). However, I would like to remind that this basically means Uming will "override" sans-serif and monospace and all Chinese will be displayed as bitmaps. Also there is no way to use Dejavu and zenhei together anymore. > > Eventually maybe. :) What about Ukai? > this is up to you and the Chinese i18n. I rarely see people use Ukai as desktop fonts despite that fontconfig default settings giving it high priority, as it is designed mostly for printing, and it look very blurry on screen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484638] [pa_IN] Default TimeZone is not selected for (Indic) language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091602.n19G2fWR020117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484638 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Chris Lumens 2009-02-09 11:02:40 EDT --- This will be fixed in the next build of anaconda. Thanks for the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NLId8032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 18:21:17 EDT --- Okay I think if you restrict wqy-zenhei-fonts to just zh, which has similarly been done to fedora cjkuni-fonts and baekmuk-ttf-fonts recently with font conf directives to restrict to one language (to avoid unihan issues, etc) then we can start to think about this seriously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NL8MK012435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092324.n19NO9KR013028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 18:24:09 EDT --- Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092337.n19NblS0015860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 18:37:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in > fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc. Certainly. I heard the fontconfig developers were re-working on the default font priorities last year, but then, nothing has happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092355.n19NtKmg019708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #329052|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100553.n1A5rChq012363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 480891, which changed state. Bug 480891 Summary: [kde] ibus systray icon is not updated like toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] [kde] ibus systray icon is not updated like toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100553.n1A5rAaP012309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2009-02-10 00:53:10 EDT --- This problem has been fixed in ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100749.n1A7nMds013231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #61 from Baif 2009-02-10 02:49:21 EDT --- Could you test it in KDE? Things do not work out for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484844] New: Tooltip can be added to application (iok)'s various button Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tooltip can be added to application (iok)'s various button https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484844 Summary: Tooltip can be added to application (iok)'s various button Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: if tooltip is added to application, that would be good to user. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iok-1.2.0-2.fc11 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. start iok (command iok) 2. goto "ToEnglish" button or other Actual results: There is no tooltip for buttion Expected results: It is helpful Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484847] New: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484847 Summary: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: while using ibus, if I select "Auto start IBus on session login" (or unselect), it has no effect even if I logout and login Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11 How reproducible: everytime if select or unselcet option Steps to Reproduce: 1. start ibus, 2. open pref (by Right Click on icon) 3. select/unselect "Auto start IBus on session login" Actual results: ibus started even if option selected Expected results: If unselect, ibus should not start Additional info: Is im-chooser preference override this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101024.n1AAOK8o032727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #62 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-10 05:24:19 EDT --- Could you tell me what is your testing env and procedures please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484853] New: Left and Right Language Buttons Make confusion sometime Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Left and Right Language Buttons Make confusion sometime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484853 Summary: Left and Right Language Buttons Make confusion sometime Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: with iok, there is two button, One is left side "Space" ToEnglish (Default) and Other is right side of "Space" "Punjabi" (or any selected keyboard layout. While I clicked on English, it changed to Punjabi and Other side toggled to English, but it is not quite understandable what is what if you don't click on it. ToEnglish - Space - Punjabi Punjabi - Space - English Can we not able to add more info for End user? like label of "Language" (left) and "Layout" or "Punjabi Inscript Layout" (for Right Side) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iok-1.2.0-2.fc11 How reproducible: Everytime, when you toggle "ToEnglish" button Steps to Reproduce: 1. start iok (Alt+F2 iok) 2. Press "ToEnglish" 3. Other Side (Right) become's English Actual results: it is not very clear what button is for layout and what is for langauge Expected results: Both button should have some detual attached Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484854] New: [feature] button 'Always on top' can be added Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [feature] button 'Always on top' can be added https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484854 Summary: [feature] button 'Always on top' can be added Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: While using application, I have to shift some other application and need to type, then iok lost under the applications. I would like to add button or menu (if button not possbile) like "Always on top". it can be found in Right click on Windows Border, but it is not easy to user Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iok-1.2.0-2.fc11 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run application iok (Alt+F2 iok) 2. open gedit, gnome-terminal 3. Alt+Shift to use application and start type using iok Actual results: During repeat of Step 3, iok lost under gedit or gnome-terminal Expected results: if have option like 'Always on top', then I can type anywhere while using iok to type Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101212.n1ACCsCB024559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:12:53 EDT --- new package has been approved and available on devel, F-10 and F-9 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101227.n1ACRH7Q027776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:27:16 EDT --- anthy-9100h-1.fc9 and anthy-9100h-1.fc10 is in testing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101227.n1ACRTbM007768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:27:28 EDT --- Thanks. anthy-9100h-1.fc9 and anthy-9100h-fc10 is in testing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101934.n1AJYoZa010021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #9 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-10 14:34:49 EDT --- here I have a problem: in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf, I used alias sections to set the preferences, I remember this is the recommended way of setting the priorities, however, if I want to use lang tags, I may have to write this whole section using match and prepend, or kill the whole section. Jens, is this what you want to do? ---------------------------------------------------- serif Bitstream Vera Serif DejaVu Serif WenQuanYi Zen Hei sans-serif Bitstream Vera Sans DejaVu Sans WenQuanYi Zen Hei monospace Bitstream Vera Sans Mono DejaVu Sans Mono WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484652] ibus-daemon does not start on login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110342.n1B3gVnC027627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484652 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110342.n1B3gWHB027646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484652 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484844] Tooltip can be added to application (iok)'s various button In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110703.n1B732H9031449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484844 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-11 02:03:02 EDT --- tooltip may be ok but this feels more like a dup of bug 484853. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484853] Left and Right Language Buttons Make confusion sometime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110702.n1B72PIS006795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484853 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-11 02:02:24 EDT --- I agree it would be good to simplify/improve the UI more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110805.n1B8593a011595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 480719, which changed state. Bug 480719 Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480719] [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110805.n1B858bx011574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Version|10 |rawhide Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:05:07 EDT --- I have fixed in 1.1.0.20090211 for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110803.n1B8325N018666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:03:02 EDT --- Fixed in 1.1.0.20090211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110803.n1B835uO018734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466232, which changed state. Bug 466232 Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110820.n1B8Klwr014319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:20:47 EDT --- Could you try ibus-m17n? ibus-m17n is an engine based on m17n library. I think m17n includes sayura keymap for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484643] ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110818.n1B8Ixct021640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484643 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Component|ibus |gtk2 AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:18:58 EDT --- I think it is better to disable immodule for password field in gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484847] Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110824.n1B8OgJ5014888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484847 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:24:41 EDT --- It has been fixed in 1.1.0.20090211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] after a language installation, ibus don't Enabled default language keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110822.n1B8Mv4T022603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:22:44 EDT --- *** Bug 466852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110822.n1B8MxRb022662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466852, which changed state. Bug 466852 Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110822.n1B8Mur1022582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:22:44 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484642 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484513] "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110827.n1B8Rcgb015671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484513 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:27:37 EDT --- I split libibus.so.* out of main package. Please test it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110846.n1B8kVmP027745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-11 03:46:30 EDT --- scim-sayura is separate IMEngine, It is not part of m17n-db -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110855.n1B8tnGj029718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 --- Comment #3 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 03:55:48 EDT --- I see. I just guess ibus-m17n provides similar input method. Right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 09:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110917.n1B9HDtd027007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-11 04:17:12 EDT --- it is different than, presently available with m17n-db, but as you suggested i think it is possible to develop such with mim file as depending on previous input it fetch present key, might be there are some more intelligence i will see it once finished in hand task :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 09:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110930.n1B9U3ap029973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #10 from Rajeesh 2009-02-11 04:30:02 EDT --- Hi Nicolas, Can we close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484643] ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111513.n1BFDQ66020478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484643 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gtk2 |ibus AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |phuang at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-11 10:13:25 EDT --- We just changed this back to allowing input methods to work with invisible entries. It's not going to change back. If ibus can be fixed to work in the lock screen situation, turn off the im just for the one password entry in the lock dialog. See http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.15/GtkEntry.html#GtkEntry--im-module for how to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111536.n1BFaajE003500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-11 10:36:36 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111608.n1BG8LZ0012972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwayne at translate.org.za --- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-11 11:08:18 EDT --- Bad news from me. I had this problem, removed all the X11 fonts and things worked. A then added a number of cool fonts and bang its broken again with this error: Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I ran fc-cache against each directory separately but this changed nothing. How the H^ll do I know which font is breaking this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111626.n1BGQB7U008797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #19 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-11 11:26:10 EDT --- Just remember I did a 'yum groupupdate Fonts' to make sure my default fonts included all standard installs. Things broke at some stage after that. But I've tracked this down, if I do: yum remove cjkunifonts-uming fontforge now works yum groupupdate Fonts This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically cjkunifonts-uming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 23:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112341.n1BNfFi9011224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail | |.com) --- Comment #20 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-11 18:41:13 EDT --- I have to ask ?wrong question? ? are you able to reproduce it with Fedora 10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 00:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120012.n1C0Cn5U016837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #10 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-11 19:12:48 EDT --- ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get updated. Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484652] ibus-daemon does not start on login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120337.n1C3b0Rp030446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484652 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-11 22:36:59 EDT --- Hi Jens, Does ibus-1.1.0.20090211 fix this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120533.n1C5XS1S009327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:33:28 EDT --- new package was built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120532.n1C5WAPK018626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:32:09 EDT --- new package was built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120546.n1C5kKPV011483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:46:20 EDT --- sorry, the above comment meant to posted at Bug#476459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120544.n1C5i4eF020577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #7 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:44:03 EDT --- Also, as I mentioned before, I set up a sub-project to complete Google's Droid Sans Fallback. In the past 3 months, we used our web-based application (demo http://wenq.org/demo/fontopia_droid_tutorial.htm) and completed all 4300+ missing Han glyphs in CJK basic (U4E00-U9FC3). In the past month, we have been doing the final review and are about to release a new font soon (named "WenQuanYi Micro Hei"). Micro hei is only 4M in size with high quality glyphs. I strongly recommend shipping this font with F11 (possibly default install for Chinese support). The latest nightly-build of the font can be found at http://wenq.org/daily/microhei/wqy-microhei-0.2-nightlybuild.tar.gz I will submit a new package request soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469555] Gettext-devel depends on CVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120557.n1C5vpKC022956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469555 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 23:38:28 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-12 00:57:51 EDT --- Actually following also debian, I agree we can just drop it completely. Doing that in gettext-0.17-9.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 06:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120619.n1C6J1Vm026667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-12 01:19:00 EDT --- As far as I can tell the first patch (in debian#433743) is already installed upstream in 0.17. I am adding the second one from debian#493218 in gettext-0.17-9.fc11. Can you please change that that solves the problem for you? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 09:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120908.n1C9853G025366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |10 Component|Other language |xkeyboard-config CC|fedora-trans-list at redhat.co |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com |m |, krh at redhat.com AssignedTo|dimitris at glezos.com |krh at redhat.com QAContact|aalam at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org Product|Fedora Localization |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 09:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120930.n1C9UqHq030693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com Platform|x86_64 |All --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-02-12 04:29:33 EDT --- are you searching for xkb layout? If you would like to help to create Kashmiri layout of m17n library that will be more helpful as Fedora is using ibus default for input. you can get more help with following wiki (mailing list etc) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121846.n1CIkCiA026754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #2 from mohammad.nayeem at gmail.com 2009-02-12 13:46:11 EDT --- Thanks for your response. Yes I am looking for xkb layout so that I could switch between english and kashmiri. Where can I find information about m17n library. The link talks about I18N project. Plus the teh following mailing list link gives me an error https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-i18n-list I get the following error: Secure Connection Failed listman.redhat.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for www.redhat.com (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain) Also, can you direct me to some of the existing keyboard layout files for e.g arabic. I want to take a look at those. Thanks again for your help. -Nayeem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 20:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122003.n1CK3t8k010989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-12 15:03:54 EDT --- Any news here? I am going to remove imsettings-xfce from the comps-f11 group for now, so people can get groupinstalls. We can add it back in if it's done in time for f11? Or should we be looking at an ibus solution here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 01:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130122.n1D1M8KX008630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-12 20:22:08 EDT --- Yes, please. that sounds reasonable. I'm still trying to have a certain time to work on this, but I didn't and may need more time to accomplish this. ibus is an alternative solution for SCIM, but not imsettings FWIW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 05:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130522.n1D5MldK008615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 00:22:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this > means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or > browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up > their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get > updated. You could still include the old config file in avail.d/. > Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks I tried wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.8.34-2.20081027cvs.fc11 and it still behaves the same way for me on a Japanese desktop, overriding the default Japanese font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 05:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus don't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130527.n1D5R755009531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|after a language |ibus don't enable a default |installation, ibus don't |engine for a new user |Enabled default language | |keyboard | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130711.n1D7B0E6028623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 484652, which changed state. Bug 484652 Summary: ibus-daemon does not start on login https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484652 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484652] ibus-daemon does not start on login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130710.n1D7AxP0028598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484652 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-13 02:10:58 EDT --- Fixed in 1.1.0.20090211-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130906.n1D96vPv031191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 04:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > yum remove cjkunifonts-uming > fontforge now works > yum groupupdate Fonts > This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts > installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically > cjkunifonts-uming. Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131225.n1DCP6S1010629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-13 07:25:05 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131514.n1DFELC6018482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #13 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-13 10:14:20 EDT --- Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja? Can you attach the 44-wqy-zenhei.conf file and the debug output: FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485438] New: ibus-engine-hangul segfault Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-engine-hangul segfault https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485438 Summary: ibus-engine-hangul segfault Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: ibus-hangul AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: $ dmesg [skip] ... ibus-engine-han[13780]: segfault at 7fff00000000 ip 00000038c5080920 sp 00007fff32c8dca8 error 4 in libc-2.9.90.so[38c5000000+169000] ibus-engine-han[13809]: segfault at 7fff00000000 ip 00000038c5080920 sp 00007fffc6b8fb88 error 4 in libc-2.9.90.so[38c5000000+169000] ibus-engine-han[13810]: segfault at 7fff00000000 ip 00000038c5080920 sp 00007fff1a8cc338 error 4 in libc-2.9.90.so[38c5000000+169000] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090211-1.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. $ /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-hangul 2. Click Trigger (ctrl+space or hangul key) 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: # rpm -qa | grep ^ibus ibus-gtk-1.1.0.20090211-3.fc11.x86_64 ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090211-1.fc11.x86_64 ibus-anthy-1.1.0.20090211-1.fc11.x86_64 ibus-libs-1.1.0.20090211-3.fc11.x86_64 ibus-1.1.0.20090211-3.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131733.n1DHXVD0006280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #22 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-13 12:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > yum remove cjkunifonts-uming > > fontforge now works > > yum groupupdate Fonts > > This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts > > installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically > > cjkunifonts-uming. > > Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or > cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug. Its related in that it does the same thing, but on a different font. See bug 485472 for a report against cjkunifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] New: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: cjkunifonts breaks fontforge operation. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum groupinstall Fonts - ensures we have a standard font install 2. fontforge - breaks 3. yum remove cjkunifonts-uming 4. fontforge - words Actual results: When crashing we get a message like this: Help! Server claimed font -some font file name (I can't remember it) existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault Expected results: fontforge works regardless of whether these fonts are installed. Additional info: A similar problem was reported in bug 450709 against xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 09:22:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140922.n1E9MF6m011799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #32 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-14 04:22:14 EDT --- On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update. VLGothic fonts: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Baekmuk fonts: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch Is this also related to this report? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141250.n1ECoJcZ018223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:50:18 EDT --- Looks nice. Maybe some over-enthusiastic providing, but that's a maintainer choice. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F BTW: would be even nicer is lohit was built from sources in %build like other well-behaved floss fonts such as liberation or dejavu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141254.n1ECsFB8000810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:54:14 EDT --- A new package request will be very welcome :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141253.n1ECribA000724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:53:43 EDT --- Will all the font changes in rawhide it would probably not be total waste if people with CJK knowledge did install all the rawhide font packages and check we do the right thing for sans/serif/monospace for CJK languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141258.n1ECwM0w001695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:58:21 EDT --- Always feel free to close bugs once you've done the changes and checked they do what was intended, reporters are not always timely available to close bugs :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] New: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: kee at ketan.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=331920) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331920) Rendering comparison Description of problem: After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example), the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but with a Chinese one. This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before. See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing. The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font. Actual results: Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font. Expected results: Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 15:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141526.n1EFQT4a014018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Ryo Dairiki changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of| |#485562 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 05:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150559.n1F5xoaO032227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of|#485562 |475743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466850] The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FIDWWe004492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151814.n1FIEpAk004635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:14:50 EDT --- confirmed fixed in rawhide please close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FIDX8U004522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466850, which changed state. Bug 466850 Summary: The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151821.n1FIL8Rj021960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:21:07 EDT --- comps.xml is updated close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151833.n1FIX5GX007698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-15 13:33:04 EDT --- Will do. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151835.n1FIZI1T024567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 466859, which changed state. Bug 466859 Summary: Dynamic order of candidate frequency. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466859 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466859] Dynamic order of candidate frequency. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151835.n1FIZH1q024538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466859 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:35:16 EDT --- upstream's decision for this to be off, until user preferences ui is ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151836.n1FIaMGd024708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |oron at actcom.co.il Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-15 13:36:22 EDT --- 1. your -compat package needs to obsolete culmus-fonts < thisversion-thisrelease for the upgrade path to work http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_old_package_is_replaced_by_several_new_packages.21 2. if you don't add a suitably threatening description to your compat package people will do stupid stuff such as adding new deps on it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=82799 3. Your descriptions and summaries may need a little work, maybe ask the Hebrew localization team for help? http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he 4. I'd have followed /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf a bit more closely to make sure the fonts are registered in the correct generic families but that's your choice to make of course The Obsolete bit is the only part which is likely to be a big problem short term -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 135428] popt : -help outputs unaligned descriptions, in case of != In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151843.n1FIhSQ7009588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135428 --- Comment #23 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:43:24 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 135428] popt : -help outputs unaligned descriptions, in case of != In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151931.n1FJVuBL002236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135428 --- Comment #24 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-15 14:31:55 EDT --- Cairus, I don't know how I should solve this problem as downstream maintainer. And upstream told me, that a native JA/KO person would be needed also having some GNOME knowledge in order to get this hopefully really solved. Let me know if I can do something more for you. Upstream contacts are e.g. mentioned in the popt package itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 01:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 135428] popt : -help outputs unaligned descriptions, in case of != In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160100.n1G10vxY024773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135428 --- Comment #25 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 20:00:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I would tend to Hu Zheng's suggestion to mark this bug as CANTFIX, if no real > solution comes up which works for every case. Shall we? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 01:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485661] New: ibus-x11 segfault Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-x11 segfault https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485661 Summary: ibus-x11 segfault Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Open im-chooser, switch from ibus to scim. See a bug-buddy window open up that reports that ibus-x11 crashed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160204.n1G2421G003626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Component|VLGothic-fonts |cjkunifonts AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |cchance at redhat.com |ge.net | Summary|vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |Chinese fonts is used for |c10 makes some Japanese |Japanese desktop after |characters get rendered |vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |with a different font |c10 installed --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-15 21:04:01 EDT --- Better reassigning to cjkunifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160234.n1G2YRrg008771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:34:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331999) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331999) fc-match-4.output.bz2 output for > FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160233.n1G2X0m6008575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:32:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja? Yes it is a default Japanese rawhide install. > Can you attach the 44-wqy-zenhei.conf file You mean it works for you in a japanese desktop session? ;-) 35f7bdfcc512ac6cb03a520e702a0c45 /etc/fonts/conf.d/44-wqy-zenhei.conf (I am not excluding a fontconfig bug: at least the behaviour seems have changed...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160251.n1G2pb1S027265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:51:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update. > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch It sounds like it could be. What if you remove the baekmuk fonts? (They are not default for Hangul anymore anyway.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485661] ibus-x11 segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160254.n1G2spOx012618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485661 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-15 21:54:50 EDT --- Fixed in ibus-1_1_0_20090211-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 03:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160302.n1G32oxt014328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 22:02:49 EDT --- Can you post the output of: rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort It would be hopeful if you can narrow down which font package is causing the problem. It might be baekmuk-ttf for example? (see also end of bug 475743 comment 32) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 03:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160340.n1G3eN5O003820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-15 22:40:22 EDT --- Hi Parag, Did you try ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-1.fc11 ? Is it still exist? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 07:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160710.n1G7AloK029442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-16 02:10:46 EDT --- Nicholas, thanks for the suggestions. Here are the updates: 1. added obsoletes to -compat. 2. added the suitable description. 3. so far, I haven't been able to find any documentation on culmus project's website or anywhere to derive proper description for every subpackage. So keeping the same generic one. 4. the .conf are derived from the original files from the upstream project, only split between subpackages. Hope that works for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161316.n1GDG3A2015025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 08:16:02 EDT --- any news now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE3Ex014203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161454.n1GEsdEw007046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkuni-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161453.n1GEr1ET006779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-16 09:52:55 EDT --- fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161551.n1GFpUHm016698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161555.n1GFtsYd017970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:55:53 EDT --- This one might be duplicated to bug #475743. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161554.n1GFsFCX003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #35 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:54:14 EDT --- I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161546.n1GFk1dk014611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:46:01 EDT --- Not reproducible in latest yum update: cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5dEl027960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5bE8027931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5aPN027910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5ZHf027876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485746] (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5Y6w027859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481434, 479371, 474734, | |474522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485746] New: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is a tracker bug for tracking all hinting issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWnqI017353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 449238] No Hebrew support (patches) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWISs016531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449238 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:21:36 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462295] fonts package list need to be updated In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWPRH016709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:05:15 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466200] empty language list leads to backtrace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWTYN016815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466200 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:41:07 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 01:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485438] ibus-engine-hangul segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170145.n1H1jsnd025638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485438 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Component|ibus-hangul |ibus Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-16 20:45:53 EDT --- This problem is in ibus package. It has been fixed in ibus-1_1_0_20090211-8_fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484643] ibus working with screen lock dialog, but not showing icon properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170217.n1H2Hi6Q030724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484643 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmccann at redhat.com, | |rstrode at redhat.com Component|ibus |gnome-screensaver AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |jmccann at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Huang Peng 2009-02-16 21:17:44 EDT --- I guess if we want to fix this problem, gnome-screen-saver needs some modification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170227.n1H2Ruhs000340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[culmus-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170238.n1H2cm0Q001842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[kacst-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170237.n1H2bPMw001718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[jomolhari-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170247.n1H2lw3s004091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[lklug-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170248.n1H2mair003791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[madan-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2qRGG005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[paktype-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170259.n1H2xi4F006522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[sazanami-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34PFv007132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|Please convert to new font |[un-core-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170302.n1H327Yt006902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] |packaging guidelines |Please convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34tvU007226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[un-extra-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus don't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170319.n1H3JRK7010458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170318.n1H3IYGg010323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Severity|high |medium Flag| |needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 22:18:33 EDT --- Comment 1 says the problem also exists with scim. Comment 3 says an earlier version of pidgin is ok with ibus. Sounds like pidgin upstream should look at this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485858] ibus needs to require imsettings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170330.n1H3UCM9012976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170330.n1H3UDE2012993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485858 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485858] New: ibus needs to require imsettings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus needs to require imsettings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 Summary: ibus needs to require imsettings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ibus does not require the imsettings package currently - it should. Steps to Reproduce: 1. install Live image of rawhide. 2. login as liveuser in CJK locale 3. rpm -q imsettings Actual results: 2. no ibus running 3. no imsettings installed Expected results: 2. ibus to be running 3. imsettings needed for that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485857] New: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857 Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: tinh911 at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=332166) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332166) Vietnamese Unicode characters The Liberation fonts are missing the Vietnamese Unicode characters. I am not a typography geek so I don't know which group those characters belong to. I attached a file to show all the unicode characters of Vietnamese in normal case and uppercase, I use Arial font for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170343.n1H3hmbU015693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 22:43:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that. May be better to test first on f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485858] ibus needs to require imsettings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170349.n1H3nV8i016292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-16 22:49:30 EDT --- Should I add im-chooser or imsettings as a require? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485861] New: ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485861 Summary: ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The ibus-setup Engine page just has an empty box for selecting an engine to add. This is confusing it should say something. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.1.0.20090211-6.fc11 Steps to Reproduce: 1. ibus-setup -> Engines Actual results: blank box for user to select engine to add Expected results: Selection box should have some text, eg "Select an input method". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170359.n1H3xGwd017996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485861] ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170359.n1H3xGoY017980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485861 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170400.n1H40TIG018577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ibus don't enable a default |ibus doesn't enable a |engine for a new user |default engine for a new | |user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485858] ibus needs to require imsettings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170358.n1H3wMS4017871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 22:58:22 EDT --- You're right probably im-chooser (or both, Tagoh-san?) is better. im-chooser requires imsettings anyway I think, though currently scim requires both but that is probably overkill? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170405.n1H45QiO019615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 23:05:25 EDT --- Behdad, could you please update on this important issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4BDJb020732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dwayne at translate. | |org.za) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4B03H020561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170413.n1H4DHQR021062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 23:13:16 EDT --- Hi Dwayne, is that still reproducible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170412.n1H4CXi6020941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Warren Togami 2009-02-16 23:12:32 EDT --- There is no way I personally will be useful on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485858] ibus needs to require imsettings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170432.n1H4WQtg023790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Huang Peng 2009-02-16 23:32:25 EDT --- I added im-chooser in spec file. Fixed in ibus-1_1_0_20090211-9_fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170432.n1H4WR1i023822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 485858, which changed state. Bug 485858 Summary: ibus needs to require imsettings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170455.n1H4tGmL027919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 23:55:15 EDT --- Japanese is still not updated anyway but that may be the ongoing upstream issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170534.n1H5YXcV000884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dwayne at translate. | |org.za) | --- Comment #3 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:34:33 EDT --- # confirmed that cjkunifonts-uming is not installed rpm -qa | grep cjk # confirmed fontforge works fontforge # Install default fonts - only cjkunifonts-uming missing and installed yum groupinstall Fonts # Check fontforge fontforge Results: Still broken... Error message: I'll past it as a comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170541.n1H5fYUx002554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:41:34 EDT --- Just for clarity... yum installed the following: Installing: cjkunifonts-uming noarch 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10 updates 10 M And the Fontforge version was: [heather at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fontforge fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170538.n1H5cG6N001803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #4 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:38:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332176) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332176) Error output from fontforge run fontforge > errors.log 2>&1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170619.n1H6JLHP008879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 242016] [ml_IN] Malayalam fonts rendered incorrectly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170709.n1H79NaA017119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 --- Comment #72 from Manilal 2009-02-17 02:09:16 EDT --- Fedora 10 renders Malayalam perfectly and the default font package is also changed. This ticket may be closed ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170758.n1H7wnGg025407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 02:58:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332188) screenshot with new fontconfig And screenshot with new fontconfig fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 Japanese font glyphs are not used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170757.n1H7vVtG025258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 02:57:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332187) screenshot with old fontconfig (In reply to comment #34) > fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem...... To clarify this, screenshot again. This one with (the old) fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11.i386 . Looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485861] ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170814.n1H8EKlW028196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485861 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-17 03:14:19 EDT --- Fixed in ibus-1.1.0.20090211-10.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170814.n1H8ELa7028222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Bug 481098 depends on bug 485861, which changed state. Bug 485861 Summary: ibus-setup Engines page should have some text in engine selector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170819.n1H8J3eZ028701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-17 03:19:03 EDT --- Yes, I see un-core-fonts being used on the ja desktop - I will try to get the fontconfig files there updated soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170849.n1H8nrh8002013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|high |medium Version|9 |rawhide AssignedTo|jmccann at redhat.com |noriko at redhat.com Severity|high |medium --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-17 03:49:52 EDT --- Noriko, I tried to get movement from upstream Japanese l10n on this a while back and still see no update. This situation has been persisting since gdm was rewritten some releases ago... Are or someone in Fedora l10n able to help get the Japanese (and maybe other) translations updated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 09:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170910.n1H9AAHH007065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-17 04:10:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > There is no way I personally will be useful on this bug. OK, but do you agree it is a pidgin regression? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxGKY031227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Bug 477427 depends on bug 477408, which changed state. Bug 477408 Summary: [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171137.n1HBbOj6007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-17 06:37:23 EDT --- How about enable all installed engines, if user does not custom it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180015.n1I0F0S1006118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-17 19:14:59 EDT --- I think that is too many - by default we install engines for all CIJK. I would prefer initializing with just engines for the desktop locale. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 02:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486056] New: Can't select keyboard laylout in hangul. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Can't select keyboard laylout in hangul. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486056 Summary: Can't select keyboard laylout in hangul. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-hangul AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Can't select keyboard laylout in hangul. (2bul, 3bul 2bul-shifted, 3bul final, 3bul 390, 3bul No-Shift, 3bul Yetguul) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1.0.20090211 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ibus-1.1.0.20090211-9.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180359.n1I3x40D013935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam 2009-02-17 22:59:03 EDT --- I agree with Jens, If all engines are installed, then also I only like to use One language in which I used to log-in (or max 2 as user). If I need more languages, then I can add later, but default I would like to select login language only (which is same behaviour SCIM has in old fedora release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 05:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180545.n1I5j77N025443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Yuan Yijun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Yuan Yijun 2009-02-18 00:45:06 EDT --- Let's talk about a patch on the BBS or ML http://bbs.fedora-zh.org/showthread.php?t=1082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 06:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180602.n1I62N8T002764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #12 from Rajeesh 2009-02-18 01:02:22 EDT --- Thanks, I just wanted to have a confirmation :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 06:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180628.n1I6SDL8006893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-02-18 01:28:13 EDT --- Ok. So I enabled hi-test.mim in ibus. Started gedit, selected test keymap. Tried to type combination given in hi-test.mim but its not working. rpm -qa | grep ibus ibus-gtk-1.1.0.20090211-9.fc11.i586 ibus-1.1.0.20090211-9.fc11.i586 ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-1.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486080] New: Hexadecimal numbered boxes appears on Japanese installation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hexadecimal numbered boxes appears on Japanese installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486080 Summary: Hexadecimal numbered boxes appears on Japanese installation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Guess because of renaming Japanese font package. please update to pull in the font from vlgothic-fonts package instead of VLGothic-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180850.n1I8oRHw026198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, | |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net, tagoh at redhat.com Component|Package Review |vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 03:50:27 EDT --- Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and submit-bug page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180948.n1I9mJcl006064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2009-02-18 04:48:18 EDT --- Fixed in ibus-m17n-1_1_0_20090211-2_fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 10:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181006.n1IA6KW2010224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 05:06:19 EDT --- After looking at xfce4-settings source code, there seems no way to provide a xsettings key outside XFCE because xfconf doesn't link to xsettings directly as xfce-mcs-manager did. so I've submitted a patch to suport it in xfce4-settings. http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4961 FYI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486083] Package Translate Toolkit 1.3.0 for F10 (Virtaal 0.3.0 in F10 had broken deps on 1.3.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181131.n1IBVtw1001713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486083 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, roozbeh at gmail.com Component|virtaal |translate-toolkit AssignedTo|dwayne at translate.org.za |roozbeh at gmail.com Summary|virtaal in F10 stable has |Package Translate Toolkit |broken deps (depends on |1.3.0 for F10 (Virtaal |translate-toolkit NOT in |0.3.0 in F10 had broken |F10 stable) |deps on 1.3.0) --- Comment #2 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-18 06:31:54 EDT --- Changed to Translate Toolkit component as Virtaal 0.3.0 can't work with earlier versions of Translate Toolkit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:41:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486083] Package Translate Toolkit 1.3.0 for F10 (Virtaal 0.3.0 in F10 had broken deps on 1.3.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181141.n1IBfVvx030981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486083 --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 06:41:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Thanks for reporting this. Darn how did I miss this one, was cautious about > this release. More importantly... why does bodhi allow pushing a package with broken deps in the first place? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486083] Package Translate Toolkit 1.3.0 for F10 (Virtaal 0.3.0 in F10 had broken deps on 1.3.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181456.n1IEuNl3016754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486083 --- Comment #4 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-18 09:56:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Thanks for reporting this. Darn how did I miss this one, was cautious about > > this release. > > More importantly... why does bodhi allow pushing a package with broken deps in > the first place? See bug 486117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486080] Hexadecimal numbered boxes appears on Japanese installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181518.n1IFIVle022621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486080 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Chris Lumens 2009-02-18 10:18:31 EDT --- This will be fixed in the next build of anaconda. It would be nice if the font packages didn't change names, contents, and directory locations so very often. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVvmk012780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:57 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWTGn013611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:29 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWJGx013395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX3jq014341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:02 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX2Ww014312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:01 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWHAI013344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:16 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWV0K013658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:30 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWf1F013846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:41 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWpsJ014080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:51 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWvUu014179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:56 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182029.n1IKTEC9031762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT --- Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ? You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components. I see the lowercase one here in that list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182313.n1INDY47006313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #8 from Oron Peled 2009-02-18 18:13:33 EDT --- * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator] * Historically the Culmus project distributed its fonts as: - Culmus (the regular fonts you just re-packaged) - Culmus fancy fonts. Extra free fonts. They are currently still packaged as: fonts-hebrew-fancy-0.20051122-4.fc10.noarch - Lately they added a third category -- Ancient fonts (for ancient Semitic scripts). All these are linked from: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/ [it's a bit confusing as the normal "Download" links of sourceforge only lead you to the "regular" Culmus fonts] * Some of the fancy fonts are unique. E.g: the "Ktav-Yad" is the only free "hand-writing" font in Hebrew. * As for naming: - For consistency to end users, i think the fonts in the "fancy" category should be named just like the other Culmus fonts. Example: culmus-ktav-yad-fonts and not: culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts. [the split to "fancy" was done for economy (bandwidth) reasons not really functional ones]. - Of course we can group the "fancy" ones via a meta-package that requires each of them. But I don't think it worth the trouble and it may confuse people to think it's yet another font from this collection. - We can add the "Ancient" ones in this go (if you have time for this) But IMO their name should contain "ancient", as they actually represent different scripts). E.g: culmus-ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts What? this is getting too much. Maybe settle for: ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts * For any help/rants etc., just mail me (on http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he you can see my email as my bugzilla account. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190205.n1J25LXC011633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:05:20 EDT --- Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190202.n1J22pf1010759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:02:51 EDT --- Actually a fixed package is already available and was waiting for someone who would volunteers confirming a fix though.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190219.n1J2J1TM014342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:19:01 EDT --- forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 04:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190459.n1J4x6sf013870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-18 23:59:05 EDT --- I am not sure what the solution is, but I filed this bug to improve the behaviour under multilib when a requested gtk immodule is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 05:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486056] Can't select keyboard layout in hangul. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190514.n1J5EqOI016694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486056 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Can't select keyboard |Can't select keyboard |laylout in hangul. |layout in hangul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486056] Can't select keyboard layout in hangul In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190601.n1J61XLQ025079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486056 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Can't select keyboard |Can't select keyboard |layout in hangul. |layout in hangul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486267] New: IBus statusicon has a useless tooltip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: IBus statusicon has a useless tooltip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486267 Summary: IBus statusicon has a useless tooltip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The tooltip "IBus - Running" is pretty pointless less and should be removed until there is something useful to say. If the icon is not obvious enough to be understood without a tooltip, get a better icon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486268] New: ibus statusicon missing a way to 'go back' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus statusicon missing a way to 'go back' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486268 Summary: ibus statusicon missing a way to 'go back' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The menu of the status icon offers no obvious way to get back to the initial state that shows the ibus icon. I have to go to an input field and type Ctrl-Space to achieve that. The corresponding scim menu has an "English" entry at the end of the list. It may be better to call it "No input method" or something similar (since the language may not actually be English) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486271] New: toolbar appears too early Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: toolbar appears too early https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486271 Summary: toolbar appears too early Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- When ibus is configured to start at login, the floating, naked toolbar appears as the first thing, way before the panel starts. This looks bad. The toolbar should remain hidden until the statusicon is embbed in the panel. See the GtkStatusIcon notify::embedded signal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486270] New: no way to turn off toolbar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: no way to turn off toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486270 Summary: no way to turn off toolbar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The toolbar is somewhat odd for people who don't have long experience with input methods, and don't expect naked, floating toolbars on their desktop. And most of the functionality (at least the switching) is available from the statusicon. I propose to - make all functionality available via the statusicon - add a way to turn the toolbar off -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486272] New: toolbar focus problems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: toolbar focus problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486272 Summary: toolbar focus problems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The toolbar seems useless if "focus-follows-mouse" is turned on, since it becomes inactive on focus out. This also affects the status icon. By focus-follows-mouse, I mean the "Select windows when the mouse moves over them" option in the "Windows" capplet. If you turn that on, and move the move from the window you are working in towards the toolbar or statusicon, the window looses focus and the status icon/toolbar turn inactive, so you can't do whatever you wanted to there in the first place... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486276] New: ibus preferences menu title mismatch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences menu title mismatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486276 Summary: ibus preferences menu title mismatch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- There is a mismatch between the menuitem and the ibus-setup window, both the window title and icon don't match the menu, as they should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486278] New: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486278 Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- "Auto start IBus on session login" is very techno babble. Can we make that something like "Enable Input Methods" ? I don't think there is any need to talk about sessions and autostart here. In the discussion, "Start IBus on login" was proposed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486275] New: menu pollution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: menu pollution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486275 Summary: menu pollution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- What is the plan, going forward, wrt to im-chooser ? I'd hate to have 2 input method related menuitems in the default install. My preference would be to not install the im-chooser by default, since it is only needed to switch back to 'legacy' frameworks. It would be great if we could use the generic "Input Method" menuitem for the ibus preferences, and maybe rename im-chooser to "Input Method Framework" or something like that. Alternatively, if we can't get rid of im-chooser by default, maybe ibus-setup should not have its own menu item (I notice that scim-setup doesn't have one either), since it is available via im-chooser. Another case of 'menu pollution' that I only spotted after doing the review is that IBus puts another menu item at Applications -> Accessories -> IBus. That is not good, imo. First of all, the menu label does not explain at all what it does, and second, it just duplicates the functionality for starting an im framework that is already present with im-chooser. Such duplication is just confusing, please drop it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486281] New: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486281 Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Engine tab - "Engine" is a technical term that is not really helpful here. How about "Languages" instead ? - There are some icons missing in the combo box, e.g Telugu-apple, Telugu-rts, Marathi-phonetic, Marathi-itrans... - The main list needs to repeat the language name (like the status icon menu already does) otherwise it is not clear if "phonetic" is Oriya or Marathi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486280] New: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486280 Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- "UI" is a bad section label. How about splitting it into two sections, a la Input Window Lookup table orientation: [Vertical] [ ] Use the system font Input Window Font: [Sans 10] Language Bar [ ] Show language bar [ ] Hide language bar when it is not needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486279] New: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486279 Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Keyboard shortcuts: I would love to see these moved to the keyboard shortcuts capplet, which has support for handling application-defined shortcuts. As a bonus, you get automatic conflict handling. The one restriction is that currently, only one key-combination per action is possible. If having multiple is essential, you could either split it into "Trigger", "Alternative Trigger", "Second Alternative Trigger", or file a bug and I'll look into enabling multiple shortcuts per action in the keybinding capplet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486282] New: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486282 Summary: ibus preferences ui improvements, part 5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- About tab This should not be done as a tab, it is very much against the style of our preference tools. There is already an About menu item on the status icon. If you absolutely want to have an "About" in the preferences, it should be a left-aligned "About" button in the action area that brings up an about dialog. But I'd really just get rid of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 07:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190731.n1J7Vqji010033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-19 02:31:52 EDT --- Should I file a bug for backporting a patch for our package, or do you want to wait for new release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191012.n1JACN6e011237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail | |.com) | --- Comment #23 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-19 05:12:20 EDT --- I could reproduce this on F-10. More infos about this can be found in the comments of bug #466404: > Whenever fontforge crashes, /var/log/Xorg.0.log updates > $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log > [...] > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 When fontforge crashed on me, only these two files referenced "cour.pfa" in any way: /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.scale After I uninstalled and reinstalled xorg-x11-fonts-Type1, fontforge worked again and the two files didn't reference cour.pfa anymore. It seems to me that the mkfontdir, mkfontscale commands in the %post/%postun scripts fail to remove references to fonts that are removed from the fonts.dir, fonts.scale files. In that case, the problem is not in the fonts packages, but in these tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191510.n1JFAhQ9020470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com, | |pnemade at redhat.com, | |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|xkeyboard-config |m17n-db -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 16:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486409] New: Wrong python binding installed path Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong python binding installed path https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486409 Summary: Wrong python binding installed path Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: libchewing AssignedTo: dchen at redhat.com ReportedBy: yehjj at pchome.com.tw QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dchen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Python binding files placed in wrong directory "/libchewing/". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libchewing-0.3.2-4.fc9 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -ql libchewing-0.3.2-4.fc9.i386 2. 3. Actual results: /libchewing /libchewing/__init__.py /libchewing/chewing.py /usr/lib/chewing /usr/lib/chewing/fonetree.dat ... Expected results: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libchewing /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libchewing/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libchewing/chewing.py /usr/lib/chewing /usr/lib/chewing/fonetree.dat ... Additional info: Refer to Koji's build.log, the following lines show where the problem is: ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libchewing.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/dist-f9-build-333781-61391/root/', None, 86400, True, 0, 102, 103, None, logger=) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libchewing.spec'] sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory Suggest add following line in "libchewing.spec" to avoid this problem: BuildRequires: python-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 21:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192121.n1JLLxKI003490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 16:21:58 EDT --- We can do either one. Thats a pretty minor patch, so if it would help you, I can apply it now. On the other hand, hopefully 4.6 final will be out soon, so we can pick it up then. Which would you prefer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200203.n1K2311w021197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-19 21:03:00 EDT --- Sure. I'll be ready to make a release, including this fix and others soon. if 4.6 final will be out before a mass-rebuild, I can wait for that then. otherwise backporting a patch would be appreciated. though I could just push new one without it and would be buildable. but not working properly without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 04:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200427.n1K4RjIX014000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #3 from A S Alam 2009-02-19 23:27:44 EDT --- Following web page can provide information. http://www.m17n.org/m17n-lib-en/index.html As mention on page, Arabic support is there. m17n-db-arabic.noarch package available in Fedora. you can get text file (mim): /usr/share/m17n/ar-kbd.mim (gedit/kate etc can be used to edit this). For mailing list Page Error, Please use this: http://support.mozilla.com/pa-IN/kb/Secure+connection+failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 07:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486409] Wrong python binding installed path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200712.n1K7ClwU007602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486409 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-02-20 02:12:46 EDT --- Issue fixed, the revision build will be in koji and bodhi shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 07:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484651] ibus-chewing needs to be updated for new ibus C API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200715.n1K7F5OJ008038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484651 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-02-20 02:15:04 EDT --- The revised source code can be seen at http://github.com/definite/ibus-chewing/downloads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484853] Left and Right Language Buttons Make confusion sometime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200941.n1K9fvvb004209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484853 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-02-20 04:41:57 EDT --- fixed in iok-1.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484844] Tooltip can be added to application (iok)'s various button In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200941.n1K9fhIX004163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484844 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-02-20 04:41:43 EDT --- fixed in iok-1.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484854] [feature] button 'Always on top' can be added In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200942.n1K9gAR4004397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484854 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-02-20 04:42:09 EDT --- fixed in iok-1.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201715.n1KHFf1P024768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #41 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-20 12:15:40 EDT --- At last, I've found that cjkunifonts-uming package is the cause of this problem in my environment. It seems like gryphs from that package are chosen in some cases, even in Japanese environments. Japanese period followed by an alphabet is the one example. After uninstalling that package, the problem goes away. And I've confirmed that reinstalling this package caused the problem again. I'll send you a detailed report later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201742.n1KHgWRr031243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 12:42:31 EDT --- @oron (In reply to comment #8) > * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator] > * As for naming: Actually the problem is not the naming, we have pretty clear naming rules nowadays, the problem are the summaries/descriptions that need help from people who actually use the fonts to become useful to new users @rahul 1. I'm 100% sure we'll have less maintenance load long term if all our font packages use the same kind of fontconfig rules 2. I think you misunderstood the Obsoleting stuff. The aim is not to have compat obsolete the new packages which should be fine, the aim is to have it obsolete the pre-split culmus-fonts < 0.101-6 to have yum update it automatically -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202049.n1KKnaKl010843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #4 from mohammad.nayeem at gmail.com 2009-02-20 15:49:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Following web page can provide information. > http://www.m17n.org/m17n-lib-en/index.html > > As mention on page, Arabic support is there. > > m17n-db-arabic.noarch package available in Fedora. > > you can get text file (mim): /usr/share/m17n/ar-kbd.mim > > (gedit/kate etc can be used to edit this). > > For mailing list Page Error, Please use this: > http://support.mozilla.com/pa-IN/kb/Secure+connection+failed Hi, Thanks. Although the kashmiri language is absed on arabic script, we have certain letters and vowels that don't exist in arabic language. Kashmir language keyboard layout would basically be an extension of arabic layout. The problem with using arabic keyboard is that words when read won't sound the way they are supposed to without the additional vowels and letters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202054.n1KKsDcg012248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #5 from mohammad.nayeem at gmail.com 2009-02-20 15:54:13 EDT --- Also, if I create the kashmiri layout by extending the arabic /usr/share/m17n/ar-kbd.mim file, what do I need to do to get it included into the fedora distribution. Including this layout would go a long way in helping kashmiri people to use fedora. Thankyou for all your help. -Nayeem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202202.n1KM2ZVo029939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 17:02:34 EDT --- ok. I have just built a version with the patch included. Let me know if you spot any problems with it or need additional work done on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 11:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486083] Package Translate Toolkit 1.3.0 for F10 (Virtaal 0.3.0 in F10 had broken deps on 1.3.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211118.n1LBIBM8016859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486083 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485857] Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230410.n1N4Axeh002691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-22 23:10:59 EDT --- Currently I got no resources on this and my current skills level is not enough to deal with hintings from scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485857] Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230408.n1N48uKt029449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857 --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-22 23:08:56 EDT --- * Vietnamese Vowel Plus Tone Mark Combinations * "A portion of this block (U+1EA0..U+1EF9) comprises vowel letters of the modern Vietnamese alphabet (quoc ngu) combined with a diacritic mark that denotes the phonemic tone that applies to the syllable. In the modern Vietnamese alphabet, there are 12 vowel letters and 5 tone marks." (The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard 4.0". Addison Wesley, US, 2003.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230419.n1N4JLWT004089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #6 from A S Alam 2009-02-22 23:19:20 EDT --- Parag Will help more on this (to add m17n keymap). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 06:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486271] toolbar appears too early In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230627.n1N6Rav0025272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486271 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 01:27:35 EDT --- I changed the default value of panel/auto_hide. So user will not see the naked toolbar, if they do not use ibus-setup to modify the default value of auto_hide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 06:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486267] IBus statusicon has a useless tooltip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230641.n1N6fon0028293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486267 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 01:41:50 EDT --- Updated the tooltip to 'IBus input method framework' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486275] menu pollution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230715.n1N7FVk3007614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486275 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:15:30 EDT --- Hide two ibus icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486268] ibus statusicon missing a way to 'go back' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230713.n1N7D15G002305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486268 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:13:01 EDT --- Fixed in upstream. What for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486281] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230720.n1N7KYl4008662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486281 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:20:33 EDT --- Fixed in upstream. Wait for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486282] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230718.n1N7INqg008071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486282 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:18:23 EDT --- This tab has been remove in upstream. Wait for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486276] ibus preferences menu title mismatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230717.n1N7HPCN003317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486276 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:17:25 EDT --- Fixed in upstrea. wait for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486280] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230723.n1N7NVla009139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486280 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:23:31 EDT --- I updated "UI" to "Font and style". And wait for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486278] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230730.n1N7UPUJ010679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486278 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2009-02-23 02:30:25 EDT --- I changed "Auto start IBus on session login" to "Start ibus on login". And wait for next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 11:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231101.n1NB1fUS024344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #7 from Parag 2009-02-23 06:01:39 EDT --- Hi Nayeem, Fedora distribution follows what upstream provides. So to include any new keymap 1) just look at existing keymaps in /usr/share/m17n/. 2) Create your keymap with correct liecense text included at top of mim file. 3) Then submit this new mim file for its review by upstream on m17n-lib-2009 at m17n.org. Where upstream will review it and suggest some changes in needed otherwise will commit into upstream m17n project. 4) Once your keymap is included in upstream cvs we can use that and build new fedora release. Get more information on upstream project at http://www.m17n.org/m17n-lib-en/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231720.n1NHKmWv023535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 --- Comment #8 from mohammad.nayeem at gmail.com 2009-02-23 12:20:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hi Nayeem, > Fedora distribution follows what upstream provides. So to include any new > keymap > 1) just look at existing keymaps in /usr/share/m17n/. > 2) Create your keymap with correct liecense text included at top of mim file. > 3) Then submit this new mim file for its review by upstream on > m17n-lib-2009 at m17n.org. Where upstream will review it and suggest some changes > in needed otherwise will commit into upstream m17n project. > 4) Once your keymap is included in upstream cvs we can use that and build new > fedora release. > > Get more information on upstream project at http://www.m17n.org/m17n-lib-en/ Thank you very much. I appreciate your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mcmonster at o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6 I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing (SCIM + Anthy) and displaying. The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and readable fonts. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Just try displaying any Japanese text. This is the update, that probably changed fonts: Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional ]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages vlgothic-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 installed vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 installed Available Packages VLGothic-fonts.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 04:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240459.n1O4xFQb001689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #42 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-23 23:59:14 EDT --- Problem: - Chinese gryphs are shown when you use Monospace even in Japanese locale. - Some characters seems different in the same context, as different gryphs are selected according to the following characters. (For example, the width of the space character followed by "A (alphabet)" has different width with the one followed by "a (hiragana)".) Reason: Fontconfig choose proper gryph for virtual fonts, according to the current locale, and the context. If you write Japanese in Japanese locale, fontconfig seeks to fonts which has Japanese gryphs. It seems like some Chinese fonts also has Japanese gryphs by some reason. Maybe, they are in CJ unified regions, so we cannot fix this problem simply by eliminating them. Talking about the second problem, both Japanese fonts and DejaVu fonts have space characters, so fontconfig sometimes choose gryphs from Japanese fonts, and sometimes from DejaVu fonts. Solution: Change the gryph selection order of Fontconfig. In Japanese environment, gryphs from Japanese gryphs should be chosen first. In Chinese environment, gryphs from Chinese gryphs should be chosen first. Talking about DejaVu fonts, either locale specific gryphs or DejaVu gryphs should be chosen independently with the context. This change maybe require huge change in fonts.conf and might need some patches in the source of fontconfig too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:30:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486279] move shortcut settings to keyboard shortcuts capplet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240530.n1O5Urg6003899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486279 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, i18n CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|ibus preferences ui |move shortcut settings to |improvements, part 2 |keyboard shortcuts capplet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 06:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485152] Kashmiri (Arabic-persian) language keyboard layout on fedora 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240618.n1O6IC7X014290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485152 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n, MoveUpstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 06:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240648.n1O6mB9Y015956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-02-24 01:48:10 EDT --- The issue is 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf. After renaming it to 67-... various glyphs came up as gothic. This file probably needs to be split into a high-priority serif portion, and a low-priority sans portion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240705.n1O75cFm019121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240709.n1O79cTw019445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 02:09:38 EDT --- Perhaps you can test with the cjkuni-*fonts packages in rawhide and see if that works better for you? They already have some fontconfig changes included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240709.n1O79rpn019494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240747.n1O7lC7A025711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-02-24 02:47:11 EDT --- Installing the fonts from Rawhide did help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240925.n1O9Pxhr015492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2009-02-24 04:25:58 EDT --- This feature has been implemented in upstream. And wait for next release. Currently implementation is ibus will enable all engines belong to current locale, and those engines will be ordered by rank. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240940.n1O9eNtV018332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-24 04:40:21 EDT --- Nicolas, As I said earlier, the configuration files were adopted from the upstream ones. Besides, I do not see much syntactical and semantic conflict between the template and given conf files. I don't even have any knowledge pertaining to the various other unavailable(to me) font families that are aliased or substituted by given fonts. Thus I may not be able to provide aliases of my own. Thus I really do not see any need to rewrite the configuration files and keep this bug open for that reason. About obsoleting, yep I was confused a bit there, and followed the documented stuff blindly. I will make that correction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 17:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241751.n1OHp5fp017797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 --- Comment #16 from sami 2009-02-24 12:51:03 EDT --- Hey guys, Any updates on this ? This is still present in F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486409] Wrong python binding installed path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKm1XK002634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:01 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libchewing'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486409] Wrong python binding installed path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242056.n1OKu4Qx004980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486409 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:56:04 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libchewing'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242358.n1ONwnpF016310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 18:58:49 EDT --- I think the package should probably "Requires: hal" for the %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor directory. A license file is really required too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250001.n1P01BvN018500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 19:01:10 EDT --- Otherwise rpmlint output is clean - a license file would also get rid of the no documentation warning. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250005.n1P057sN017820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 19:05:07 EDT --- > NOTE: The files in this packages conflict with the ones shipped in > xorg-x11-server-Xorg. This is intentional, it is going to replace them (X will > than depend on this package). It might be worth adding a "Conflicts: xorg-x11-server-Xorg < (last fedora-setup-keyboard.py version-(release+1))" for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484142] imsettings-applet warnings on Emacs startup in Gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250206.n1P26CPn010547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484142 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-24 21:06:11 EDT --- should be fixed in imsettings-0.106.0-1.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250208.n1P28UbM010242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-24 21:08:29 EDT --- Fixed in imsettings-0.106.0-1.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475907] duplicate autostart file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250216.n1P2GVhc012025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475907 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-24 21:16:30 EDT --- Fixed in imsettings-0.106.0-1.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250221.n1P2Lebk013065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 21:21:39 EDT --- Excellent. ;) Feel free to re-add to comps and close this when you are sure the new version is working ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250217.n1P2HCZ3012200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-24 21:17:12 EDT --- Fixed in imsettings-0.106.0-1.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:27:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250227.n1P2RMrp014067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-24 21:27:22 EDT --- In fact you not really removed it from comps but only from the xfce-desktop group, it's still in the imput-methods group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250234.n1P2Y7SC015333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-24 21:34:07 EDT --- Right because it only prevents xfce installation or upgrading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250426.n1P4QHED008536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-24 23:26:17 EDT --- i have backported to F10: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/cjkunifonts/0.2.20080216.1/11.fc10/noarch/cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10.noarch.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=86225 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250429.n1P4Td8K009226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 23:29:38 EDT --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487259] New: gdm hang when select language select Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gdm hang when select language select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487259 Summary: gdm hang when select language select Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gdm AssignedTo: jmccann at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: jmccann at redhat.com, rstrode at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Application hang, when click on language -> Other. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gdm-2.25.2-3.fc11 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. start (wait for) gdm 2. click on Language section, goto other (open language list) 3. Actual results: GDM hang unexpected Expected results: language list should open Additional info: test locale en_US -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250513.n1P5DiX6017219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kee at ketan.jp) --- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-25 00:13:43 EDT --- Hi Yuta, could you kindly provide the test case you mentioned in comment #1 please? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486281] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250646.n1P6kJ4o001689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486281 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:46:18 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250646.n1P6kXnT001728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-25 01:46:32 EDT --- As usual no word from Behdad... Sami, what font you want to see/use by default? Does dejavu workforyou? What is your testcase? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250647.n1P6l0NQ001682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486280] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250646.n1P6kZEO001581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486280 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:46:35 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486282] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250645.n1P6jiGH001515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486282 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:45:43 EDT --- The new release has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487269] New: ibus-hangul is missing Hanja Conversion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-hangul is missing Hanja Conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487269 Summary: ibus-hangul is missing Hanja Conversion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-hangul AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446452,481098 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- ibus-hangul is missing Hanja conversion. This is pretty important... Please match the expected hotkeys of popular Hangul IM software for both Korean native and US-International keyboards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486267] IBus statusicon has a useless tooltip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250648.n1P6mhCO002008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486267 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:48:43 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486278] ibus preferences ui improvements, part 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250647.n1P6lBfB001873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486278 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:47:10 EDT --- This Combobox has been removed. The new release has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486271] toolbar appears too early In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250648.n1P6m6nt001953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486271 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:48:05 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484642] ibus doesn't enable a default engine for a new user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250649.n1P6n1Lf002049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484642 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:49:01 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486275] menu pollution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250647.n1P6llX4001934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486275 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:47:47 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486276] ibus preferences menu title mismatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250647.n1P6lSsu001872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486276 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:47:27 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486268] ibus statusicon missing a way to 'go back' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250648.n1P6mNUZ001979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486268 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-02-25 01:48:23 EDT --- The new release has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250656.n1P6ukc6003573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-25 01:56:45 EDT --- Please include the output of "rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort" eg http://ar.wikipedia.org/ looks ok to me on a default F10 and rawhide installs currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 07:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250739.n1P7dTSb010305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(apeter at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-25 02:39:28 EDT --- Ani,Is it still present? I think this is fixed but cannot judge in the absence of a screenshot :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250930.n1P9UWhE031851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-25 04:30:31 EDT --- Fixed in man-pages-ja-20090215-1.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 202925] wrong rendering of Japanese combining characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250943.n1P9hfEG001603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202925 lexual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |floss at lex.hider.name Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #6 from lexual 2009-02-25 04:43:40 EDT --- Thank you for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported to the author of the software, and the Fedora developers don't plan to work on it at the moment. You can help out by adding any helpful additional information you have to the upstream bug report at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139950 If you want to follow what happens to the bug, you can add yourself to the upstream report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 12:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251258.n1PCwqWD014461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-25 07:58:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Fixed in man-pages-ja-20090215-1.fc11. (I met with different bug, but I will post here because I felt I don't want to open another ticket for the following reason...) # LANG=C yum -y upgrade man-pages-ja Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2 Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package man-pages-ja.noarch 0:20090215-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved =============================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================== Updating: man-pages-ja noarch 20090215-1.fc11 koji-11 5.4 M Transaction Summary =============================================================== Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total size: 5.4 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/ja/man8/vigr.8.gz from install of man-pages-ja-20090215-1.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package shadow-utils-2:4.1.2-11.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251316.n1PDG2KN019377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-25 08:16:01 EDT --- Hmm, well, this issue sometimes happens so I don't mind to remove it from the package though, the above logs looks strange to me. this manpage isn't actually new. you should be aware of it when you upgraded shadow-utils, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251326.n1PDQO38020094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-25 08:26:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hmm, well, this issue sometimes happens so I don't mind to remove it from the > package though, the above logs looks strange to me. this manpage isn't actually > new. you should be aware of it when you upgraded shadow-utils, no? Oh, I didn't notice that this file is already owned by the two. Well, this happened because of the side-effect(?) of the change in redhat-rpm-config (i.e. rpm changed to use SHA-256 instead of MD5 for file digests). Currently latest shadow-utils rpm is using old MD5 checksum (and is under mass rebuild for this issue), newly compiled man-pages-ja already uses SHA-256. So even if these files are the same, on rpm database currently it is regarded as "different". Anyway removing one of this will resolve this issue and it will be no problem, I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251331.n1PDVEuR021255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-25 08:31:14 EDT --- Aha. that makes sense. anyway, fixed in -2.fc11. Thank you for catching this up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487275] Could not parse file '/usr/share/applications/xfce4-im-chooser.desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251553.n1PFrRtW029890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487275 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 10:53:26 EDT --- Just in case it isn't obvious, s/:/=/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487275] Could not parse file '/usr/share/applications/xfce4-im-chooser.desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251553.n1PFr6LG029664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487275 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, mclasen at redhat.com, | |tagoh at redhat.com Component|redhat-menus |im-chooser AssignedTo|rstrode at redhat.com |tagoh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251616.n1PGGxcF003914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 --- Comment #19 from sami 2009-02-25 11:16:57 EDT --- Yes, I tried it on another f10 and it looked fine. I found that I had paktype-fonts-2.0-2.fc8.noarch installed removed it and the page looked fine. I installed dejavu and it looks even better. I must have been carrying old settings since I did an upgrade Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251801.n1PI16c0031849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #6 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-25 13:01:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > NOTE: The files in this packages conflict with the ones shipped in > > xorg-x11-server-Xorg. This is intentional, it is going to replace them (X will > > than depend on this package). > > It might be worth adding a "Conflicts: xorg-x11-server-Xorg < (last > fedora-setup-keyboard.py version-(release+1))" for this. Well can't do this unless the xorg package is changed to use this fedora-setup-keyboard. (As xorg builds might be made during this review), besides it already conflicts with this packaged via file conflict. Fixed the other 2 issues (license file and hal requirement) http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard.spec http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252253.n1PMrKFS019832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #7 from Peter Hutterer 2009-02-25 17:53:19 EDT --- I'll add the conflicts line once the package is available and the xorg-x11-server package got its requires on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 02:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487275] Could not parse file '/usr/share/applications/xfce4-im-chooser.desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260212.n1Q2Ci33024125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487275 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-25 21:12:44 EDT --- Doh! just a typo. I'm not quite sure what I took for. Anyway fixed in im-chooser-1.2.6-2.fc11. Thanks for your report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260312.n1Q3CSjf003478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-25 22:12:27 EDT --- ok, so this is back in. Shall we close this bug now? Or is there any further reason to leave it open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260413.n1Q4D5Uq022544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-25 23:13:04 EDT --- No. I was about to close this. thanks for reminding me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260459.n1Q4xpTY030901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-25 23:59:50 EDT --- Seems good, thank you! Now closing as I reported for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 12:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261248.n1QCm2ps030411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #13 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-26 07:48:01 EDT --- U0cca gets normalized into u0cc6+u0cc2. Due to which the direct rules applied for the above given conjuncts do not work. So, we have to write a 'psts' rule for U0c9d+U0cc6+U0cc2. Only problem with this kind of rule is that even if the u0c9d, u0cc6 and u0cc2 follow in this order they get combined instead of the dotted circle being displayed after U0cc6. But that looks like a bug with pango and not the font. So, I will be releasing the fix in this way in next release of lohit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487581] New: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581 Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: adam.buchbinder at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020911 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.6 According to the bug on freedesktop.org (link below), Liberation Mono has an incorrect spacing definition for "Combining Diacritical Marks"; they should have zero space, and should render above the last letter, not the next one. Paste following text with selected font: Correct: accent above o Incorrect: accent above g Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Enter a string with a combining diacritic mark in Liberation Mono, e.g., "o?g". Don't use gnome-terminal; it relies on vte, which doesn't handle combining characters. Use something like gedit; switching fonts will reveal the issue as the diacritical mark switches places. Actual Results: The diacritic appears one letter to the right of where it should be. Expected Results: The diacritic should appear in the proper place. I'm using ttf-liberation 1.04.93-1 on Ubuntu Intrepid; I'm filing this as an upstream bug. If this should be filed elsewhere, please let me know. I'm filing this because several monospace fonts have incorrect spacing for "Combining Diacritical Marks": http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487581] Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262019.n1QKJO1u007935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581 --- Comment #1 from Adam Buchbinder 2009-02-26 15:19:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333380) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333380) Video of the issue being triggered. This video shows the diacritic changing position when the selected font is changed. Note that the diacritic moves to the right when Liberation Mono is selected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487640] mistranslation at toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270738.n1R7cg8P018816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487640 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 08:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270812.n1R8CSTo025493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Yuta Kitamura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kee at ketan.jp) | --- Comment #11 from Yuta Kitamura 2009-02-27 03:12:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333444) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333444) Test case after cjkunifonts-uming package updated OK, here's a screenshot. It seems that everything is working flawlessly. Just FYI, I've updated only cjkunifonts-uming package, because it's the only package of cjkunifonts-* series installed in my box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 487259] gdm hang when select language select In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280314.n1S3EqFn030226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487259 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-27 22:14:51 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 487593 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281822.n1SIMkXi017527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796 Igor Pires Soares changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |igor at projetofedora.org --- Comment #13 from Igor Pires Soares 2009-02-28 13:22:44 EDT --- We really need to get this solved for Fedora 11. The F10 version of Fedora's gdm is missing some translated strings for Brazilian Portuguese too, although the upstream version was fully translated in time for GNOME 2.24. The same is about to happen with F11 and GNOME 2.26. A fix for this would be highly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.