[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Builder monitoring



Once upon a time Wednesday 15 August 2007, Mike McGrath wrote:
> We've recently started taking a closer look at the builders and as a
> result we've been getting many notifications.  As a baseline, the
> builders need some work.  One thing we've been getting alerted of is
> memory usage, in particular less than 10% swap free.
>
> We have a couple of options.
>
> 1) stop monitoring swap on the builders
> 2) reduce resolution on the builders (check less often and require more
> failures in a row before notification, right now is 3 failures in a row
> results in a notification)
> 3) increase swap (presently about 1G / core so between 2G and 8G of swap
> on the boxes)
>
> Build guys!  What do you think?
>
>     -Mike
Some builders could really do with some more ram.  but in the mean time 
perhaps up swap to 1.5g/core 

Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]