Builders and mock

[Dennis Gilmore]

Once upon a time Thursday 16 August 2007, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 08/16/2007 02:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Once upon a time Thursday 16 August 2007, Oliver Falk wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2007 09:14 AM, Oliver Falk wrote:
> >>> On 08/01/2007 03:10 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >>>> Don't upgrade mock on the builders!   Long story short, xenbuilder2
> >>>> was having issues earlier this week staying up.  Hoping it was a known
> >>>> problem I yum updated the box.  Mock was updated.  Some of these
> >>>> updates, however, were with the exit code.  We had many builds return
> >>>> a successful result even though the build failed.  Jesse is looking
> >>>> into this and following up with the mock people.  I've since rolled
> >>>> back to the previous version - 3.0.6-1.fc6
> >>>>
> >>>> That is all :)
> >>>
> >>> Oh yes... Same problem at AlphaCore. Next time I encounter some 'bug'
> >>> I'll let you know so you don't run into the same problem. :-)
> >>
> >> FYI.
> >> mock 0.7.4-1.fc8 works fine for AC; I don't know about 0.7.5 yet...
> >
> > Builders are all FC-6 Boxes.
>
> That doesn't mean, you cannot upgrade to mock 0.7.x, does it? :-)
>
Actually it does.  the newer mock requires newer yum which i dont know what 
testing its had on python 2.4.  We have always used whats in fedora on the 
builders.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070816/81b55a31/attachment.sig>