[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Infratructure Meeting Log for 2007/08/23



16:04:39 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Role Call
16:04:41 < mmcgrath> Who's here?
16:04:43  * ricky 
16:04:43 -!- jeremy [i=katzj nat/redhat/x-4bc27ba525a17715] has quit Remote closed the connection
16:04:43 -!- warren [i=warren nat/redhat/x-2dc6a46ecf6fecaa] has quit Remote closed the connection
16:04:48 < paulobanon_> me
16:05:00 < mmcgrath> and again jeremy and warren.  Gone at the same time!
16:05:04  * lmacken 
16:05:06 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: ?
16:05:08  * skvidal is on asterisk
16:05:10 < skvidal> and here
16:05:20 < lmacken> hah! why does that happen every week ?
16:05:36 < mmcgrath> lmacken: I have no idea, but its like clockwork :)
16:05:37 -!- jeremy [i=katzj nat/redhat/x-48f778bf0db0139e] has joined #fedora-meeting
16:05:39 < lmacken> seriously
16:05:42 < ricky> Yay :)
16:05:47 < mmcgrath> and jeremy's back :)
16:06:08 < mmcgrath> Ok, I think we have enough to get started, lets take a look at tickets.
16:06:15  * jeremy waves
16:06:32 < mmcgrath> jeremy: why is it that you and warren both log off every time the infrastructure 
                     meetings start?
16:06:46  * mmcgrath not complaining, just amused by it.
16:07:12 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Tickets
16:07:13 < mmcgrath> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=milestone&keywords=%7EMeeting&order=priority
16:07:29 < jeremy> not sure what's going on tbh
16:07:33 -!- warren [i=warren nat/redhat/x-7b788734ded94462] has joined #fedora-meeting
16:07:36 < ricky> Woo.
16:07:44 < mmcgrath> Not much to talk about on the ticket side it looks like.
16:07:54  * ricky thought that the meeting keyword was removed from the wiki ticket.  Hmm..
16:08:00 < mmcgrath> VCS is there but jcollie isn't around right now (#14)
16:08:06 < mmcgrath> ricky: I thought we did to
16:08:35 < ricky> OK, it's gone now.
16:08:46 < paulobanon_> ricky: i think it was removed from the wiki things and passed to FAS
16:08:54 < paulobanon_> (that was the plan anyway)
16:09:02 < mmcgrath> either way we'll skip it for now.
16:09:31 < mmcgrath> One thing I don't really want to talk about but wanted to mention is ticket #137
16:09:59 < mmcgrath> As a group (Infrastructure) I think going forward and in order to ensure our 
                     continued growth we'll have to be more sponsorship aware.
16:10:20 -!- k0k [n=k0k fedora/k0k] has quit "Abandonando"
16:10:37 < paulobanon_> mmcgrath: have u already started to look for other intl partners/sponsors ?
16:10:39 < mmcgrath> This means 1) keep your ears to the ground about opportunities for Fedora 
                     Infrastructure (and Fedora in general) and 2) we'll have to make sure to keep the 
                     relationships with our current sponsors good.
16:10:58 < mmcgrath> paulobanon_: yeah, some people have responded with some leads and I've contacted 
                     some other people.
16:11:30 < dgilmore> opps me is here now
16:11:48 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: sorry im late
16:11:51 < mmcgrath> To be blunt, I have very little experience in requesting this sort of things but 
                     I'm working on it and taking notes and will hopefully get good at it soon
16:11:53 < paulobanon_> mmcgrath: after the meeting save me 5mins
16:11:56 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: no worries, we're just getting started.
16:12:00 < mmcgrath> paulobanon_: sure thing
16:12:30 < mmcgrath> having said that, we're just getting started into activly looking for hosting 
                     sponsors so we can mold it any way we want.
16:13:00 < mmcgrath> Anyone have any questions regarding what I'm doing and whats going on there?  I 
                     know I haven't really been cc'ing the list on emails I've sent out.  That doesn't 
                     seem approperate I think.
16:13:07 < mmcgrath> And I don't want to scare off anyone :)
16:13:20 < paulobanon_> scare us then :)
16:13:21 < skvidal> yay for more options and decentralizing our infrastructure, imo
16:13:55 < mmcgrath> FYI all thats the general idea.  Spreading the load a bit, bringing content faster 
                     (especially internationally) and lowering the cost from RH.
16:14:10  * mmcgrath notes RH hasn't asked for this, I'm just doing it because it makes 'cents' 
16:14:11 < skvidal> it also increases the likelihood that we stay up
16:14:22 < mmcgrath> yep.  and its always good to have options.
16:14:25 < skvidal> if we end up in a problem at one colo
16:14:49 < paulobanon_> skvidal: true
16:15:42 < skvidal> a fiber cut doesn't necessarily nuke us
16:15:47 < skvidal> which is, imo, good :)
16:15:49 < mmcgrath> The other thing is that it looks like a lot of hosting solutions out there already 
                     offer Fedora.
16:15:58 < mmcgrath> Ok, if there's no questions there I'll move on.
16:16:11 < glezos> mmcgrath, what's the Boards opinion on this?
16:16:18 < ricky> As long as they upgrade every ~13 months :)
16:16:35 < mmcgrath> glezos: I don't think they've formed an official opinion.
16:16:48 -!- G [n=nigel wikipedia/NigelJ] has quit Connection timed out
16:16:50 < mmcgrath> skvidal and dgilmore are on the board, what do you two think?
16:17:14 < skvidal> yay for more options and decentralizing our infrastructure
16:17:33 < mmcgrath> heh
16:17:50 < skvidal> seriously
16:17:57 < skvidal> I think the general idea is this
16:18:02  * dgilmore is all for de centralising our infrastructure some 
16:18:16 < skvidal> 1. fedora-infrastructure is really helping increase the interaction of community 
                    memebers in fedora admin
16:18:33 < skvidal> 2. the path we're taking is for sustainability and maintability - yay to both of 
                    those
16:19:03 < skvidal> 3. in general this is a good direction to go
16:19:13  * paulobanon_ yays to skvidal && dgilmore opinions
16:19:15 < glezos> I believe so too.
16:19:18 < skvidal> that's really it
16:19:25 < glezos> yay for it
16:19:31  * jima stumbles in
16:19:42 < mmcgrath> glezos: thats the sense I get from most people with the hesitation of not really 
                     knowing whats out there and the general adverse feelings towards 'advertising'.
16:19:50 < mmcgrath> so we go forward, but with caution :)
16:20:03 < skvidal> though
16:20:05 < skvidal> so far
16:20:12 < glezos> mmcgrath, +1 for caution on 'adviertising'
16:20:15 < skvidal> no one is pissy about the dell stamp at the bottom of the webpages
16:20:28 < skvidal> and I doubt if we had a rackspace or dreamhost or other thing down there
16:20:32 < skvidal> we'd gain a lot of ire
16:20:39 < ricky> After the reaction to smolt+Fedora branding, I see what mmcgrath means, though.
16:20:40 < skvidal> however, there are lines
16:20:45 < mmcgrath> I agree, especially since places like rackspace offer fedora hosting :)
16:21:18 < glezos> more choices are always better than one :)
16:21:41 < paulobanon_> we can always sell the idea of global load-balancing :)
16:21:46 < mmcgrath> You guys will hopefully be hearing a lot from me on this front over the next 
                     several weeks.  I'll be contacting probably every lead that comes my way but won't 
                     be ccing everyone about it.  I'm not trying to be secret or anything, its just a 
                     matter of being practical.  Feel free to ask questions.
16:22:02 < mmcgrath> also suggest any hosting provider you might like or know of.
16:22:18 < mmcgrath> and if your company isn't a hosting provider but might be able to spare space and 
                     bandwidth in a rack in some colo, let me know.
16:22:30 < skvidal> mmcgrath: how about a report on the responses you've gotten every week or so?
16:22:40 < skvidal> mmcgrath: just so people know what's going on and also know who you've contacted or 
                    not?
16:22:51 < mmcgrath> That sounds very reasonable.
16:22:57 < paulobanon_> +1
16:23:21 < lmacken> +1
16:23:27 < mmcgrath> My goal is to have at least one other proxy server to use, thats not hosted in PHX 
                     before the F8 launch.
16:23:40 < mmcgrath> but certainly by F9 a fuller solution will hopefully be in place.
16:23:57 -!- G [n=nigel wikipedia/NigelJ] has joined #fedora-meeting
16:24:09 < dgilmore> skvidal: indeed your right
16:24:14 < mmcgrath> Ok, so we'll move on for now if there aren't any other questions on that front?
16:24:32 < skvidal> dgilmore: in general I think that's true - about what in particular? :)
16:24:34 < mmcgrath> Anyone have any new sponsors?
16:24:43 < mmcgrath> I've added jima to the noc group.
16:24:59 < mmcgrath> jima: welcome
16:25:13 < paulobanon_> mmcgrath: not that many new requests :)
16:25:27 < mmcgrath> true
16:25:33 < dgilmore> skvidal: about de centralising
16:25:42 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: ?
16:25:44 < jima> yeah, i'm sure people are flocking to infrastructure
16:25:58 < mmcgrath> jima: we're a different breed of people :)
16:26:03 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: i was reading up got called away for a sec
16:26:05 < jima> mmcgrath: that we are
16:26:14 -!- bpepple|lt [n=bpepple|@rrcs-70-61-160-147.central.biz.rr.com] has joined #fedora-meeting
16:26:14 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: ahh
16:26:15 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: but please keep us in the loop
16:26:20 < mmcgrath> will do
16:26:32 < dgilmore> jima: about time :D
16:27:08 < mmcgrath> Well, thats really all that is on the schedule. No new SOP's.
16:27:13 -!- Renault [n=couretca AToulon-151-1-131-130 w86-206 abo wanadoo fr] has quit "Quitte"
16:27:20 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Open Floor
16:27:26 < mmcgrath> Anyone have anything they'd like to discuss?
16:27:29 < paulobanon_> Noc
16:27:36 < mmcgrath> paulobanon_: have at it.
16:27:52 < paulobanon_> there has been a raise of alerts with the builders
16:28:01 < paulobanon_> regarding offline status
16:28:15 < paulobanon_> anything for us to worry about in general ?
16:28:20 < mmcgrath> ahh, good question
16:28:38  * jima kicks ekiga
16:28:47  * paulobanon_ wouldnt sleep if he had his blackberry on the pager app :)
16:29:08 < dgilmore> paulobanon_: generally its nothing to worry too much about
16:29:10 < mmcgrath> So the builders have been having issues
16:29:12 < mmcgrath> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260401
16:29:23 < dgilmore> right now builers are under a much heavier than normal load
16:29:29 < mmcgrath> We've actually hit a xen bug of some kind, I have someone internally (one of the 
                     virt guys) looking into it.
16:29:30 < paulobanon_> dgilmore: gotcha
16:29:32 < dgilmore> but we have that damn xen bug
16:30:06 < paulobanon_> k, makes sense
16:30:10 < mmcgrath> I would actually like to talk about the build system in general.
16:30:29 -!- Morph [i=gareth mulder wiked org] has joined #fedora-meeting
16:30:32 < mmcgrath> In general I've been a little unhappy with the buildsystem over the last couple of 
                     months and its because of a lot of issues.
16:30:42 < mmcgrath> 1) capacity.  We actually do have builders, but have been unable to find a place to 
                     put them.
16:31:07 < mmcgrath> This is mostly a failure of mine I guess since its my job to find places for this 
                     stuff but it's been difficult.
16:31:20 < paulobanon_> places == hardware?
16:31:47 < mmcgrath> yeah, we just haven't found a place to put the stuff and as a result its been 
                     sitting on the floor somewhere unpowered.
16:32:00 < paulobanon_> :/
16:32:12 < mmcgrath> I'm hopeful this will be corrected within the next couple of months but at the same 
                     time when I ask GIT about it I get unclear, or different answers (if any)
16:32:31 < paulobanon_> whats GIT ?
16:32:46 < skvidal> Global Information Tech
16:32:49 < mmcgrath> 2) The missing dep issue on fedora-maintainers was annoying.  It was one of those 
                     things that makes us look bad though it wasn't really our fault.
16:32:53 < skvidal> red hat's IS service
16:32:54 < paulobanon_> skvidal: thanks
16:32:56 < mmcgrath> paulobanon_: they're Red Hat's version of us :)
16:33:16 < skvidal> mmcgrath: they're not as fun as we are, though. :)
16:33:27 < paulobanon_> skvidal: ++1
16:33:35 < skvidal> heh
16:33:35 < paulobanon_> :)
16:33:37 < skvidal> I'm just kidding
16:33:44 < skvidal> I'm sure they're a blast
16:33:52 < mmcgrath> :)
16:33:56 < paulobanon_> heh
16:33:59 < mmcgrath> and 3) Successful failed builds.
16:34:04 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: do you have an update on that?
16:34:27 < mmcgrath> I don't know if it isn't happening as much now or if people just stopped 
                     complaining about it.
16:35:07  * nirik saw a report of it this morning in #epel. It's still happening I think. 
16:35:35 < paulobanon_> mmcgrath: is #3 happening due to the capacity thing, koji, or any other unknown 
                        reason ?
16:35:47 < mmcgrath> I know dgilmore has been busy, I wonder if it would be possible to recruit another 
                     buildsys member to help.
16:35:53 < mmcgrath> its an unknown thing.
16:36:03 -!- G_ [n=nigel wikipedia/NigelJ] has quit Connection timed out
16:36:06 < mmcgrath> a build will succeed, mock exits with 0 (as it should) but then plague thinks it 
                     failed.
16:36:54 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: ?
16:37:03 < mmcgrath> maybe $DAYJOB called :)
16:37:05 < paulobanon_> he prolly got called again
16:37:12 < mmcgrath> we can go back to that later.
16:37:36 < mmcgrath> So yeah, the builder outages are bad but they're being worked on.
16:37:45 < mmcgrath> Anyone else have something they would like to discuss?
16:38:10  * jima fields a phone call while trying to get sip software to work ;P
16:38:14 < mmcgrath> ricky: can you give us our weekly FAS2 round up?
16:38:56 < ricky> Well, I've attempted to move all access controll stuff into auth.py- it might need to 
                  be checked for some logic errors :)
16:38:59 < nirik> mmcgrath: is there any wiki page or other info about sponsoring? What is needed and 
                  what a sponsor gets? My company might be interested, but I would need info on what I 
                  am asking from them and what they get...
16:39:27 < ricky> I'll probably be asking a bit about the formalities surrounding the CLA process/how we 
                  plan to do that soon.
16:40:04 < mmcgrath> nirik: I'm new to that so I've been taking notes as I go.  I've been getting 
                     spatterings of email from people and there was a thread on FAB about it but I 
                     hesitate to write anything down yet because I don't want to make false promises.
16:40:30 < mmcgrath> nirik: if you are interested send me an email and I'll give you the low down.
16:40:40 < ricky> Other than that, as mentioned before, I'm looking into using a separate database to 
                  manage stuff such as email changes and pending requests for groups.
16:40:50 < mmcgrath> ricky: cool, I had always thought of that as almost a wizard process.
16:40:50 < skvidal> mmcgrath: should we talk about start.fedoraproject.org?
16:40:55 < mmcgrath> I want to make it easier.
16:41:05 < mmcgrath> skvidal: yeah, we'll do that after FAS2.
16:41:06 < nirik> mmcgrath: ok.
16:41:13 < skvidal> ok
16:41:45 < ricky> So e-mail verification will be handled on creating an account- does that mean that we 
                  can do a sign/copy/paste process?
16:42:02 < ricky> (And just check the validity of the signature/that it matches the e-mail)?
16:42:03 < mmcgrath> ricky: yeah or a file upload or something.
16:42:12 < ricky> Ah, that easier, actually. 
16:42:13 < warren> much easier than e-amil
16:42:15 < warren> e-mail
16:42:33  * dgilmore is here now 
16:42:34 < mmcgrath> we'll still want to forward it as an email on.  All CLA's get sent to some mailbox 
                     for legal (I don't even really know if they check it but even now they get 
                     forwarded there)
16:43:07 < mmcgrath> ricky: sounds like thats going well, anything else?
16:43:32 < ricky> That's it for now- I'm taking a tiny break and looking at possible website stuff at 
                  the moment.
16:43:40 < mmcgrath> cool
16:44:06 < mmcgrath> Ok, as skvidal mentioned, there's a possible new feature for F8.  
                     http://start.fedoraproject.org/
16:44:11 < skvidal> 'feature'
16:44:22  * mmcgrath digs up FAB link
16:44:24 < skvidal> everyone go to start.fedoraproject.org
16:44:30 < paulobanon_> going
16:44:40 < skvidal> it's a google search page for fedora - like the firefox search page in default 
                    firefox browsers
16:44:59 < skvidal> the feature suggestion is to make that fedora's default homepage in 
                    firefox/konqueror/etc
16:45:28 < mmcgrath> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-August/msg00158.html
16:45:29 < warren> I hope we do keep it very simple like this.
16:45:29 < skvidal> now right now the website is at rackspace
16:45:36 < skvidal> warren: not likely
16:45:52 < skvidal> and it is a JSP
16:45:56 -!- mbonnet is now known as mbonnet_
16:45:57 < skvidal> that will/can change
16:45:58 < warren> skvidal, with a prominent link to all the fedora info
16:46:18 < skvidal> again - it needs to be a bit busier than it is
16:46:30 < skvidal> but I agree - not confusingly so
16:46:35 < mmcgrath> skvidal: actually I think right now that is just a static page.
16:46:39 < ricky> JSP?  Why does it need anything more than a static page?
16:46:43 < paulobanon_> skvidal, mmcgrath: whats the possibility for u guys to contact google to sponsor 
                        a minigoogle ?
16:46:44 < skvidal> the search results are jsp
16:46:57 < skvidal> a google bot?
16:46:59 < skvidal> no.
16:47:05 < skvidal> we don't want to host any non-open infrastructure
16:47:05 < warren> if the front page is kept simple like this, perhaps 1) people wont change the front 
                   page 2) we can easily display new info prominently 3) maybe Fedora can score some 
                   google ad revenue
16:47:07  * mmcgrath never did bother searching
16:47:11 < paulobanon_> it also works as a search engine
16:47:17 < ricky> Aha, I guess the JSP thing might not be active at the moment. 
16:47:18 < skvidal> and a google bot is decidedly non-open
16:47:32 < skvidal> warren: the front page is not a decision for the infrastructure team to make
16:47:33 < paulobanon_> skvidal: thats true
16:47:42 < warren> skvidal, right, it was just an idea
16:47:52 < skvidal> what fedora gets out of this is some revenue
16:48:01 < skvidal> the adwords would pay back to us
16:48:32 < mmcgrath> skvidal: maybe thats the part I missed, where's the jsp come into play?  I was 
                     under the impression that no serverside stuff was going on as of yet except for the 
                     handoff to google.
16:48:51 < warren> who decides what goes on the front page?
16:48:57  * warren wants to know who to talk to.
16:49:02 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: i think its just to add some dynamic contenet
16:49:04 < skvidal> mmcgrath: don was a bit fuzzy on that to me, too. but he was very clear it can be 
                    replaced with other languages
16:49:06 < jima> that sounds like policy to me ;)
16:49:08 < dgilmore> internal only stuff
16:49:15 < skvidal> warren: docs/websites/board
16:49:20 < dgilmore> it could be python from my understanding
16:49:26 < skvidal> warren: the same people who determine what goes on fp.org
16:49:28 < skvidal> dgilmore: yes
16:49:32 -!- rdieter_away [n=rdieter sting unl edu] has quit Remote closed the connection
16:49:45 < warren> mmcgrath, it is possible for the page to be static (local) while using ajax for 
                   optionally displaying a dynamic headline
16:49:57 < skvidal> warren: yes-  that was discussed on fab list
16:50:06 < skvidal> but the point for this discussion
16:50:08 < skvidal> is not that part
16:50:19 < warren> ajax, sorry for using you.
16:50:26 < mmcgrath> I guess its murky because the non-static stuff they are proposing doesn't exist.  I 
                     don't know what its supposed to do.
16:50:31 < skvidal> the part is - if we get this - we'll need to have a place to put it
16:50:32  * ricky shudders a bit.
16:50:36 < skvidal> b/c we want it on machines WE control
16:50:50 < skvidal> WE == fedora infrastructure
16:50:56 < skvidal> WE != red hat, inc
16:51:08 < paulobanon_> skvidal: duke ?
16:51:10 < mmcgrath> which, right now, it is on RH, inc.
16:51:20 < skvidal> paulobanon_: they can be in the colo
16:51:24 < skvidal> but if max calls me and says
16:51:31 < skvidal> "take that ad box off there RIGHT NOW"
16:51:40 < skvidal> I don't want to have to go through seven layers of indirection to get it done
16:51:46 < ricky> Heh.
16:51:48 < skvidal> I want one of us to be able to ssh in, modify puppet and nuke it
16:51:53 < mmcgrath> paulobanon_: well I think we could host it, especially if we can get a few more 
                     proxy boxes.  The question is I still don't know what the heck the 'server side' is 
                     supposed to do.
16:52:02 -!- gregdek is now known as gregdek_gone
16:52:13 < skvidal> mmcgrath: I'll get a firm answer on that
16:52:23 < mmcgrath> k
16:52:28 < skvidal> paulobanon_: hosted at the phx colo is fine - multiple sites is better
16:52:37 < skvidal> I'm not worried about rh being evil - it's clear rh is NOT being evil
16:52:43 < skvidal> my concern is with rh being busy
16:52:56 < skvidal> and not being able to get to something immediately b/c of other priorities
16:52:57 < paulobanon_> skvidal: understood
16:52:59 < warren> The non-static stuff could be very simple, simply serving the RSS data for display.  
                   Load would be relatively small.
16:53:06 < mmcgrath> <nod> the first rollout of start.fp.o is currently planned to be on A box in a 
                     rackspace datacenter.
16:53:07 < warren> All links from there go elsewhere
16:53:15 < dgilmore> skvidal: its currently in a colo AFAIK  we should make sure don gives sysadmin-main 
                     access
16:53:36 < warren> mmcgrath, is rackspace a certainty?  There are cheaper options
16:53:47 < skvidal> dgilmore: yah - it's only for f8t2 - I think bu t3 or GA we should have that fixed
16:53:48 < dgilmore> warren: don already has the server rented
16:53:51 < skvidal> warren: rackspace is where it is now
16:53:51 < warren> ah
16:54:00 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: we can do that, I've made it very clear that what is currently there is 
                     not 'live' or 'blessed' to be official.
16:54:30 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: reminds me i should setup access to sparc builders
16:55:26 < mmcgrath> So long story short, we as a group have a list of demands and we need to communicat 
                     that to Donald.
16:55:36 < skvidal> I'll do it
16:55:46 < skvidal> and I'll cc dgilmore and mmcgrath on it, kewl?
16:55:53 < mmcgrath> skvidal: k, if you change your mind let me know.
16:55:54 < dgilmore> skvidal: sounds perfect
16:56:16 < skvidal> dgilmore: you're ausil@ right?
16:56:21 < skvidal> mmcgrath: why would I change my mind?
16:56:23  * mmcgrath notes we're only talking about implementation here.  What it is, does and any $$ 
          that get exchanged is between the board I guess.
16:56:32 < mmcgrath> skvidal: no idea, just throwing it out there :0
16:56:38 < skvidal> mmcgrath: ok
16:57:26 < skvidal> dgilmore: yo uneed to get dgilmore@ as an alias :)
16:57:34 < mmcgrath> Ok, so it sounds like we have some action items to do there.
16:57:43 < mmcgrath> Anyone have anything else?  we've got about 5min left in the meeting.
16:58:25 < mmcgrath> Ok, if no one has anything we'll close the meeting in 30
16:58:42 < mmcgrath> 15
16:58:52 < mmcgrath> 5
16:59:01 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Meeting End
16:59:04 < mmcgrath> Thanks for coming everyone
16:59:09 < paulobanon_> thx mmcgrath
16:59:15 < ricky> Thanks.
16:59:39 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Channel is used by various Fedora groups 
          and committees for their regular meetings | Note that meetings often get logged | For 
          questions about using Fedora please ask in #fedora | See 
          http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/FedoraMeetingChannel for meeting schedule
17:00:49  * ricky finally finishes reading the mailing list thread :)
17:01:37 < dgilmore> skvidal: dgilmore@ works
17:01:43 < skvidal> ooo good
17:01:49 < dgilmore> skvidal: i am ausil@ though
17:02:44 < dgilmore> i should sign up for a second account or do something to blacklist dgilmore from 
                     becoming a fas account
17:03:08 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: we should add a blacklist feature to FAS
17:03:09 < ricky> Hm..  the same probably applies to all of those extra aliases in there :)
17:03:21 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: probably a good idea
17:03:23  * ricky adds a TODO for FAS2.
17:03:25 < warren> didn't we get rid of the aliases?
17:03:40 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: hey, I forgot to ask you have you had any more chance to debug the failed 
                     successful builds?
17:03:45 < mmcgrath> warren: just the Firstname.Lastname aliases.
17:03:47 < dgilmore> warren: there are aliases that are there for things not part of fas
17:03:51 < warren> ooh
17:04:02 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: no  ill get some time tonight
17:04:03  * jima doesn't miss the firstname.lastname alias
17:04:11 < jima> but then, no one really uses my name anyway
17:04:24 < dgilmore> jima: alot of people probably dont know it
17:04:30 < jima> dgilmore: nope
17:07:29 < jima> heh, i guess i got a sip client to work, after the meeting ended ;)

Attachment: pgpSdPzSzi0mM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]