[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Infrastructure SCM



Same as me, any is good.

As Seth git is alphabetically first so +1 git

On 7/2/07, Luke Macken <lmacken redhat com > wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again.  Since we want it to be distributed we're left with
> either git or mercurial.  Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on
> this list as to a preference on each?  Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.  What do you guys
> think?
>
>
> git:
>
> mercurial:

I don't care either way.  Mercurial has been treating me well for bodhi
development, but I've also been interested in learning git.

luke

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]