Testers needed: mirrormanager

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:40 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >
> > Isn't the CLA supposed to contain the Export Compliance statement? I
> > had signed the CLA some long time ago, and it still wants the Export
> > Compliance statement from me. Or am I mixing apples and oranges?
> >   
> I'm not sure if the CLA covers this (I don't think it does) but I do 
> know that you don't need a CLA to be a mirror but you do need to sign 
> the export agreement.  Really we're not the right people to answer a 
> question like that, anyone know how legal questions like this should be 
> handled?

I don't think you need a lawyer here.  A read of the CLA makes it clear
that it does not cover export control:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/CLA

I've submitted my plain-English CLA to the appropriate legal counsel for
approval -- that means this cannot be relied upon yet -- but it is at
least close to the mark, and may help in clarifying for ya'll what the
CLA is and is not:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KarstenWade/Drafts/PlainEnglishCLA

IANAL, TINLA, YMMV, caveat emptor, etcetera.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070314/f97ff449/attachment.sig>